Prune redundant property chains over 'in taxon'. #813
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The following two property chains over 'in taxon' (RO:0002162): * 'develops from' o 'in taxon' SubPropertyOf: 'in taxon' * 'develops from part of' o 'in taxon' SubPropertyOf: 'in taxon' are redundant because 'develops from' (RO:0002202) and 'develops from part of' (RO:0002225) are subproperties of 'has developmental contribution from' (RO:0002254), which is already part of the following chain: * 'has developmental contribution from' o 'in taxon' SubPropertyOf: 'in taxon' So we can remove those two chains.
dosumis
approved these changes
Oct 9, 2024
aleixpuigb
approved these changes
Nov 1, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The following two property chains over
in taxon(RO:0002162):develops fromoin taxonSubPropertyOf:in taxondevelops from part ofoin taxonSubPropertyOf:in taxonare redundant because
develops from(RO:0002202) anddevelops from part of(RO:0002225) are subproperties ofhas developmental contribution from(RO:0002254), which is already part of the following chain:has developmental contribution fromoin taxonSubPropertyOf:in taxonSo we can remove those two chains.