Skip to content

Comments

fix: yaml error in code-reviewer agent#115

Merged
obra merged 1 commit intoobra:mainfrom
onelesd:fix-code-reviewer-yaml
Nov 20, 2025
Merged

fix: yaml error in code-reviewer agent#115
obra merged 1 commit intoobra:mainfrom
onelesd:fix-code-reviewer-yaml

Conversation

@onelesd
Copy link
Contributor

@onelesd onelesd commented Nov 16, 2025

Fixes a yaml parser error in agents/code-reviewer.md

Motivation and Context

It was preventing me from reusing this agent in opencode.

How Has This Been Tested?

In opencode.

Breaking Changes

None.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation update

Checklist

  • I have read the MCP Documentation
  • My code follows the repository's style guidelines
  • New and existing tests pass locally
  • I have added appropriate error handling
  • I have added or updated documentation as needed

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated internal documentation formatting for consistency.

Note: This release contains no user-facing changes or new functionality.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 16, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request updates the code reviewer configuration file with a formatting modification. A description field is reformatted from a single-line value to a multiline block scalar, with no changes to functionality or the model specification.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Change Summary
Configuration Formatting
agents/code-reviewer.md
Description field reformatted from single-line to multiline block scalar; no functional changes

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

  • Purely cosmetic formatting change with zero functional impact
  • No logic, behavior, or configuration values altered

Poem

🐰 A dash of whitespace, a line breaks free,
The words now breathe in harmony,
No logic changed, just form refined,
Aesthetics bloom in well-spaced lines. ✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: fixing a YAML error in the code-reviewer agent, which is directly supported by the raw summary and PR objectives.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 02c8767 and 1b4994b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • agents/code-reviewer.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
agents/code-reviewer.md (1)

3-4: YAML block scalar formatting fix looks good.

The change from implicit to explicit block scalar syntax (using |) is the correct approach for preserving multiline text in YAML and should resolve the parser error preventing reuse in opencode. The indentation and syntax are correct.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide custom instructions to shape the summary (bullet lists, tables, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example:

"Create a concise high-level summary as a bullet-point list. Then include a Markdown table showing lines added and removed by each contributing author."


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@aaryan-rampal aaryan-rampal mentioned this pull request Nov 20, 2025
9 tasks
@obra obra merged commit 9a96184 into obra:main Nov 20, 2025
1 check passed
@obra
Copy link
Owner

obra commented Nov 20, 2025

TY!

EthanJStark pushed a commit to EthanJStark/superpowers that referenced this pull request Dec 16, 2025
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jan 19, 2026
9 tasks
aronchick pushed a commit to aronchick/superpowers that referenced this pull request Feb 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants