-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Constraints decompress to use re.1.7.1 #11619
Conversation
Note that it's only because decompress builds with deprecation warnings as errors. This is ill-advised... |
✅ All lint checks passed 91d564b
✅ Installability check (8507 → 8507) |
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ depends: [ | |||
"ocamlfind" {build} | |||
"base-bytes" | |||
"alcotest" {test} | |||
"re" {test} | |||
"re" {test & = "1.7.1} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
you're missing a "
here at the end of 1.7.1
@rgrinberg yeah but it's better to change |
travis fails with the following issue:
the CI has more checksum issues:
|
Hmmhmm, I can an explanation about mismatch hash for |
It seems than GitHub has changed the way to generate their release archives (cf. this issue), it could be better to not use GitHub then ... |
This issue is well known at this point. If you use topkg, you'll upload your own archives to github whose checksums will not change. So you'll avoid this problem. Perhaps you didn't use topkg for these old releases? |
Ah ok, so about |
Ok, so I really don't like to change checksum on packages but it's needed in this case. I uploaded |
There is yet another failure (sorry):
|
there are still some issues:
OCaml 4.06 (see https://travis-ci.org/ocaml/opam-repository/jobs/356605803) trying to build decompress.0.5:
|
Ok, the nightmare will be done soon. Currently, The plan is to not cut now The idea, is to let (for a little time) |
@dinosaure since only the tests are not working in decompress.0.7 with OCaml.4.06.*, you can as well remove the |
Good solutions, thanks 👍 ! |
Looks good enough. Thanks ! |
It seems than
re
breaks compatibility.