Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(dlm):data delete failure in periodic task and remove sys tenant verification #857

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Nov 22, 2023

Conversation

guowl3
Copy link
Collaborator

@guowl3 guowl3 commented Nov 20, 2023

What type of PR is this?

type-bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

The data delete job will work as a periodic task, and users cannot configure the sys tenant user.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Additional documentation e.g., usage docs, etc.:


@guowl3 guowl3 added the type-bug Something isn't working label Nov 20, 2023
@guowl3 guowl3 added this to the ODC 4.2.2-bp milestone Nov 20, 2023
@guowl3 guowl3 self-assigned this Nov 20, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@yizhouxw yizhouxw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@guowl3 guowl3 changed the title [WIP]fix(dlm):data delete failure in periodic task and remove sys tenant verification fix(dlm):data delete failure in periodic task and remove sys tenant verification Nov 22, 2023
@yizhouxw yizhouxw merged commit 2a3bf6f into dev/4.2.2 Nov 22, 2023
10 of 11 checks passed
yhilmare pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 15, 2024
…erification (#857)

* do not check sys tenant user.

* fix data delete failed after data archived.

* fix delete data failed.

* fix delete data failed.

* fix delete data failed.

* fix update limit config failed.

* fix rollback failed.

* upgrade dlm sdk to 106
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
type-bug Something isn't working
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants