Update Actor description to distinguish from a campaign threat actor #1290
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: Paul Agbabian <pagbabian@splunk.com>
… to clarify that it isn't a threat actor from a campaign. Signed-off-by: Paul Agbabian <pagbabian@splunk.com>
pagbabian-splunk
requested review from
floydtree,
Aniak5,
mikeradka,
zschmerber,
jonrau-at-queryai and
davemcatcisco
as code owners
mikeradka
added
enhancement
|
A note here since it came up in discussion, per @jonrau-at-queryai, as far as OSINT is concerned when we get to 1.5.0-dev we will start work on some generic attribution/campaign object. Also per @pagbabian-splunk , if we update OSINT in 1.5.0-dev, we would want to be explicit (e.g. threat_actor campaign_actor) |
jonrau-at-queryai
approved these changes
Dec 18, 2024
pagbabian-splunk
added
description_updates
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Related Issue: N/A (Slack discussion)
Description of changes:
There was a discussion in Slack that called out some new OCSF users being confused by
actorthinking it is a threat actor, i.e. from a campaign. Althoughactormight be a vehicle for a threat actor, the descriptions in the dictionary and the object add a sentence making the distinction.