Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Llama] Add descriptive names for symbolic variables #180

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 30, 2024

Conversation

Lunderberg
Copy link
Member

Because the symbolic variables may appear in many places throughout the resulting module, they should have more descriptive names, which can be understood outside of their original contexts.

@Lunderberg
Copy link
Member Author

Equivalent to the upstream mlc-ai#1684, but for the llama model definitions present in the octoml fork.

@sunggg
Copy link
Member

sunggg commented Jan 30, 2024

LGTM, I merged the other PR before knowing this, would you mind rebase to the latest?

Because the symbolic variables may appear in many places throughout
the resulting module, they should have more descriptive names, which
can be understood outside of their original contexts.
@Lunderberg Lunderberg force-pushed the llama_symbolic_var_names branch from fda9d2c to f10881d Compare January 30, 2024 16:39
@Lunderberg
Copy link
Member Author

Certainly, and rebased!

@masahi masahi merged commit 34c7137 into batch-serving Jan 30, 2024
1 check passed
@Lunderberg Lunderberg deleted the llama_symbolic_var_names branch February 5, 2024 15:12
Lunderberg pushed a commit to Lunderberg/mlc-llm that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2024
* Update

* fix

---------

Co-authored-by: tqchen <tqchenml@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants