Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement socket datagram provider #19

Closed
shefty opened this issue Sep 3, 2014 · 0 comments
Closed

Implement socket datagram provider #19

shefty opened this issue Sep 3, 2014 · 0 comments

Comments

@shefty
Copy link
Member

shefty commented Sep 3, 2014

Add datagram message endpoint support to the socket provider.

@shefty shefty added this to the alpha release milestone Sep 3, 2014
@shefty shefty closed this as completed Dec 18, 2014
aingerson referenced this issue in aingerson/libfabric Jan 25, 2017
Update to use connreq parameter with accept/reject
jswaro added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 11, 2018
contrib/cray: Workaround for SFT test failures
JuliaRS pushed a commit to JuliaRS/libfabric that referenced this issue Mar 12, 2020
Align ict/master with ict/impi2019u6 branch
tstruk added a commit to tstruk/libfabric that referenced this issue Oct 7, 2024
…est ofiwg#19)

LEX-3874: Fix lpp_regression test

* LEX-3874: Fix lpp_regression test

There were two issues:

* Simple-rma test failed with invalid caps/flags error.
  This is because the tests only requested limited functionality in
  getinfo() call in the hints, but then called requested more caps in
  the actuall write call. Updated the requested caps in the util_init().

* Atomic tests failed with -90 message too big error.
  This is because the FI_LPP_MAX_EAGER_SIZE env var gets set to 0
  in bashrc or other env setup for GDR tests.
  To fix this one needs to explicitly to set the env variable
  FI_LPP_MAX_EAGER_SIZE=2048 (the default value).
  Updated README file with this info.

* Some minor unrelated updates.

Signed-off-by: Tadeusz Struk <tstruk@gigaio.com>


Approved-by: Eric Pilmore
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant