-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 393
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Define atomic inject/injectto operations #30
Labels
Milestone
Comments
Addressed in commit 496e0f6 |
hppritcha
pushed a commit
to hppritcha/libfabric
that referenced
this issue
Feb 28, 2015
Changes for moving ep_type to ep_attr (upstream pull request ofiwg#698) Hopefully this will make everything all good.
jswaro
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Oct 1, 2018
contrib/cray: Create additional MPI tests in pipeline
tstruk
added a commit
to tstruk/libfabric
that referenced
this issue
Oct 7, 2024
LEX-3997: zero out MR key on fi_mr_close() * LEX-3997: zero out MR key on fi_mr_close() While running some extensive RCCL tests, the test crashed one of the systems. Debugging with GDB showed that it was a double free in rbtErase() that caused the crash. The backtrace looks as follows: .#0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:50 .ofiwg#1 0x00007f458280c859 in __GI_abort () at abort.c:79 .ofiwg#2 0x00007f458287726e in __libc_message (action=action@entry=do_abort, fmt=fmt@entry=0x7f45829a1298 "%s\n") at ../sysdeps/posix/libc_fatal.c:155 .ofiwg#3 0x00007f458287f2fc in malloc_printerr (str=str@entry=0x7f45829a3628 "double free or corruption (fasttop)") at malloc.c:5347 .ofiwg#4 0x00007f4582880c65 in _int_free (av=0x7f4374000020, p=0x7f437409b1f0, have_lock=0) at malloc.c:4266 .ofiwg#5 0x00007f4582719e78 in rbtErase (h=<optimized out>, i=<optimized out>) at /srcbuilddir/src/rbtree.c:353 .ofiwg#6 0x00007f458274c0c3 in lpp_mr_map_remove (lpp_mrp=0x7f437409b130) at /srcbuilddir/prov/lpp/src/lpp_mr.c:148 .ofiwg#7 lpp_mr_close_internal (lpp_mrp=0x7f437409b13… Approved-by: Eric Pilmore
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add inject calls to the atomic operations, similar to what's available for RMA.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: