Cypress Test for create a new facility in organization #9846
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces comprehensive Cypress end-to-end testing for facility management functionality. The changes include creating a new test suite in Changes
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested Labels
Suggested Reviewers
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
✅ Deploy Preview for care-ohc ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
Deploying care-fe with
|
| Latest commit: |
2f01ef7
|
| Status: | ✅ Deploy successful! |
| Preview URL: | https://d36218f8.care-fe.pages.dev |
| Branch Preview URL: | https://facility-creation.care-fe.pages.dev |
![github-advanced-security[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/57789?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
CARE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Project |
CARE
|
| Branch Review |
facility-creation
|
| Run status |
|
| Run duration | 01m 36s |
| Commit |
|
| Committer | Mohammed Nihal |
| View all properties for this run ↗︎ | |
| Test results | |
|---|---|
Failures
|
0
|
Flaky
|
0
|
Pending
|
0
|
Skipped
|
0
|
Passing
|
6
|
| View all changes introduced in this branch ↗︎ | |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
cypress/utils/commonUtils.ts (1)
8-8: Ensure consistent 10-digit phone numbers.The slice operation might not always return exactly 9 digits if
Math.random()generates a number with fewer decimal places.Consider padding the number with zeros:
- const remainingDigits = Math.random().toString().slice(2, 11); + const remainingDigits = Math.random().toString().slice(2, 11).padEnd(9, '0');cypress/utils/facilityData.ts (1)
166-168: Simplify array shuffling using a dedicated utility function.The current shuffling implementation using
sort()with random comparison isn't the most reliable shuffling method.Consider implementing Fisher-Yates shuffle:
- const shuffledFeatures = [...FACILITY_FEATURES].sort( - () => Math.random() - 0.5, - ); + const shuffledFeatures = [...FACILITY_FEATURES]; + for (let i = shuffledFeatures.length - 1; i > 0; i--) { + const j = Math.floor(Math.random() * (i + 1)); + [shuffledFeatures[i], shuffledFeatures[j]] = [shuffledFeatures[j], shuffledFeatures[i]]; + }cypress/e2e/facility_spec/facility_creation.cy.ts (1)
22-57: Add assertions for facility details in search results.The test verifies the facility name but doesn't check other important details.
Add more comprehensive verification:
// Search for the facility and verify in card facilityPage.searchFacility(testFacility.name); facilityPage.verifyFacilityNameInCard(testFacility.name); + facilityPage.verifyFacilityDetailsInCard({ + type: testFacility.type, + address: testFacility.address, + features: testFacility.features + });src/pages/Organization/OrganizationFacilities.tsx (1)
72-72: Review grid layout changes and add mobile breakpoint.While adding test attributes improves testability, removing
grid-cols-1might affect the mobile layout. Consider keeping it for better mobile responsiveness.- className="grid gap-4 md:grid-cols-2 lg:grid-cols-3" + className="grid grid-cols-1 gap-4 md:grid-cols-2 lg:grid-cols-3"Also applies to: 76-79
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/facility_creation.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/pageObject/auth/LoginPage.ts(0 hunks)cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts(1 hunks)cypress/support/commands.ts(1 hunks)cypress/utils/commonUtils.ts(1 hunks)cypress/utils/facilityData.ts(1 hunks)public/locale/en.json(1 hunks)src/components/Facility/CreateFacilityForm.tsx(12 hunks)src/pages/Organization/OrganizationFacilities.tsx(1 hunks)src/pages/Organization/components/AddFacilitySheet.tsx(1 hunks)src/pages/Organization/components/OrganizationLayout.tsx(1 hunks)src/pages/UserDashboard.tsx(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- cypress/pageObject/auth/LoginPage.ts
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- src/pages/UserDashboard.tsx
- src/pages/Organization/components/AddFacilitySheet.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (3)
📓 Common learnings
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/facility_creation.cy.ts (2)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
Learnt from: kihan2518B
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#8956
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:261-261
Timestamp: 2024-12-04T18:58:47.241Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, the test case titled "Create a new facility with no bed and doctor capacity" includes steps to select bed types and specializations before validation. This is done intentionally to verify that error messages are shown properly when no capacity is specified.
cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts (1)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
🪛 GitHub Check: CodeQL
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/facility_creation.cy.ts
[failure] 10-10: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts
[failure] 66-66: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
[failure] 66-66: Insecure randomness
This uses a cryptographically insecure random number generated at Math.random() in a security context.
🪛 GitHub Actions: Cypress Tests
cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts
[error] 9-9: Element '[data-cy="organization-list"]' not found in page. Test timed out after 10000ms waiting for the element.
[error] 70-70: Method 'verifyErrorMessage' is not defined. TypeError: cy.verifyErrorMessage is not a function
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/pages/Organization/components/OrganizationLayout.tsx (1)
182-182: LGTM! Well-structured test attribute.The
data-testidattribute follows testing best practices with a consistent prefix and descriptive naming pattern.Let's verify the uniqueness of the test IDs across menu items:
✅ Verification successful
✅ Test attribute implementation verified as unique and consistent
The dynamic generation of test IDs using
item.title.toLowerCase()ensures uniqueness across menu items, and we can see it's already being successfully used in tests.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify uniqueness of data-testid attributes for menu items # Expected: Each menu item (Organizations, Users, Patients, Facilities) should have a unique data-testid # Search for all data-testid attributes in the codebase to check for potential conflicts rg 'data-testid="org-nav-' --type ts --type tsxLength of output: 77
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for data-testid patterns in all ts/tsx files fd -e ts -e tsx --type f --exec rg -A 1 -B 1 'data-testid.*org-nav-' {}Length of output: 366
src/components/Facility/CreateFacilityForm.tsx (1)
Line range hint
180-449: LGTM! Test attributes are well-placed for facility creation form.The data-cy attributes have been strategically added to all form elements, providing good test coverage for the facility creation workflow.
Let's verify that all critical form elements have test attributes:
✅ Verification successful
All form elements have proper test attributes
The verification confirms that all critical form elements in the facility creation form have appropriate data-cy attributes, providing comprehensive test coverage for the entire workflow. The review comment's assessment is accurate.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify test coverage of form elements # Check for any form elements without data-cy attributes rg -U 'FormField[\s\S]*?(?=FormField|$)' | rg -v 'data-cy'Length of output: 311
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for form elements without data-cy attributes echo "=== Searching for Input components without data-cy ===" ast-grep --pattern 'Input $$$' | rg -v 'data-cy' echo -e "\n=== Searching for Select components without data-cy ===" ast-grep --pattern 'Select $$$' | rg -v 'data-cy' echo -e "\n=== Searching for Textarea components without data-cy ===" ast-grep --pattern 'Textarea $$$' | rg -v 'data-cy' echo -e "\n=== Searching for FormControl without data-cy in children ===" ast-grep --pattern 'FormControl> $$$ </FormControl>' | rg -v 'data-cy'Length of output: 739
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for form elements without data-cy attributes in TSX files echo "=== Searching for form elements without data-cy in CreateFacilityForm.tsx ===" rg -t tsx '<(Input|Select|Textarea|Button|Checkbox)' src/components/Facility/CreateFacilityForm.tsx | rg -v 'data-cy' echo -e "\n=== Checking other form components in the Facility directory ===" fd CreateFacilityForm.tsx src/components/Facility -x rg -l '<FormControl>' {} | xargs rg '<(Input|Select|Textarea|Button|Checkbox)' | rg -v 'data-cy'Length of output: 1087
public/locale/en.json (1)
926-926: LGTM! Success message added for facility creation.The localization entry for facility creation success message has been added correctly.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
cypress/fixtures/users.json (1)
Line range hint
2-4: Security: Update weak admin credentialsThe admin credentials ("admin"/"admin") are extremely weak and appear to be default values. Even in test environments, it's recommended to use strong passwords.
Consider updating admin credentials to match the strength of other users:
"admin": { "username": "admin", - "password": "admin" + "password": "Test@123" },
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts (1)
80-99:⚠️ Potential issueAdd retry logic and fix custom command usage.
- Add retry logic for facility search:
verifyFacilityNameInCard(facilityName: string) { - cy.get('[data-cy="facility-cards"]').should("contain", facilityName); + cy.get('[data-cy="facility-cards"]', { timeout: 10000 }) + .should("be.visible") + .and("contain", facilityName); }
- Based on the past review comments, ensure the custom command is defined in
cypress/support/commands.ts:// Add to cypress/support/commands.ts Cypress.Commands.add('verifyErrorMessages', (messages: string[]) => { messages.forEach(message => { cy.get('[data-cy="error-message"]') .should('be.visible') .and('contain', message); }); });
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts (1)
1-100: Consider adding error handling and logging capabilities.To improve test debugging and maintenance:
- Add a logger utility:
// cypress/utils/logger.ts export const log = { info: (message: string) => cy.log(`INFO: ${message}`), error: (message: string) => cy.log(`ERROR: ${message}`), debug: (message: string) => cy.log(`DEBUG: ${message}`) };
- Wrap critical operations with try-catch blocks and logging:
import { log } from '../utils/logger'; async fillBasicDetails(name: string, description: string) { try { log.info(`Filling basic details: ${name}`); await this.enterFacilityName(name); await this.selectFacilityType(); await this.enterDescription(description); log.info('Basic details filled successfully'); } catch (error) { log.error(`Failed to fill basic details: ${error.message}`); throw error; } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
cypress/e2e/facility_spec/facility_creation.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/login_spec/loginpage.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/fixtures/users.json(1 hunks)cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts(1 hunks)cypress/support/commands.ts(2 hunks)cypress/utils/commonUtils.ts(1 hunks)cypress/utils/facilityData.ts(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (4)
- cypress/utils/commonUtils.ts
- cypress/e2e/facility_spec/facility_creation.cy.ts
- cypress/support/commands.ts
- cypress/utils/facilityData.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts (2)
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
Learnt from: nihal467
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9846
File: cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts:18-23
Timestamp: 2025-01-08T10:57:45.377Z
Learning: In the facility creation form, the facility type dropdown is hardcoded and its options are always available, making additional error handling unnecessary.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
cypress/e2e/login_spec/loginpage.cy.ts (1)
17-20: Verify the removal of login response verificationThe login response verification was removed from this test. This reduces the test's reliability as it only checks the URL redirect without verifying the actual login response.
Let's check if other tests cover the login response verification:
cypress/fixtures/users.json (1)
Line range hint
1-14: Verify test data isolationThe test credentials appear to be used directly in the test environment. This could potentially interfere with real user data or cause test flakiness.
Let's check if these credentials are properly isolated to the test environment:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
cypress/support/commands.ts (1)
84-88:⚠️ Potential issueNotification system migration remains incomplete.
While
verifyNotificationhas been updated to use Sonner toast selectors,closeNotificationstill uses the old PNotify selector.Apply this diff to maintain consistency:
- cy.get(".pnotify") + cy.get("li[data-sonner-toast]")
🧹 Nitpick comments (16)
cypress/support/index.ts (2)
7-7: Consider adding type safety for roles.The
roleparameter is currently typed as a string, which could lead to runtime errors if an invalid role is provided.Consider using a union type to restrict allowed values:
type UserRole = 'staff' | 'admin' | 'patient'; // add other valid roles loginByApi(role: UserRole): Chainable<Subject>;
7-7: Document the available roles.Add JSDoc comments to document the available roles and their purposes to improve developer experience.
/** * Logs in a user with the specified role using API authentication. * @param role The user role to authenticate as. Available roles: * - 'staff': Regular staff member with basic permissions * - 'admin': Administrator with full access * - Add other roles and their descriptions * @returns Chainable for continued commands * @example * cy.loginByApi('staff') */ loginByApi(role: string): Chainable<Subject>;cypress/docs/cypress.md (3)
1-4: Enhance the overview section with more context.While the overview provides a basic introduction, it would be more helpful to include:
- The purpose of Cypress testing in our project
- Types of tests covered (e.g., E2E, integration)
- Prerequisites for writing tests
18-23: Add specific examples for facility creation tests.Consider enhancing the Getting Started section with:
- A link to the facility creation test as a reference implementation
- Code snippets demonstrating the use of Page Object Model
- Examples of commonly used commands and patterns
24-25: Expand the support section with specific channels.Consider adding:
- GitHub issue templates for test-related issues
- Contact information for the testing team
- Guidelines for contributing to test documentation
cypress/docs/patterns.md (2)
3-11: Enhance documentation with more context and explanations.While the example clearly shows the preferred pattern, it would be more helpful to:
- Explain why
verifyAndClickElementis preferred over the chain approach- Document what
verifyAndClickElementdoes internally- Include information about timeout and retry behavior
## Element Interaction ### Preferred Command Usage ```typescript // Correct cy.verifyAndClickElement('[data-cy="element"]', "Button Text"); // Avoid cy.get('[data-cy="element"]').should('be.visible').click();
+### Why use verifyAndClickElement?
+- Handles both element verification and click in a single command
+- Includes built-in retry-ability and proper timeout handling
+- Ensures consistent behavior across tests
+
+### Internal Behavior
+The command:
+1. Waits for element to exist in DOM
+2. Verifies visibility
+3. Checks if text matches (if provided)
+4. Ensures element is clickable
+5. Performs the click operation--- `34-50`: **Enhance test structure example with more realistic scenarios.** The current example could be improved with: 1. Complete setup in `beforeEach` 2. Error handling examples 3. Proper assertions 4. Documentation for the PageObject pattern ```diff ## Test Structure ```typescript +/** + * Page Object for facility management + */ +class FacilityPage { + private readonly selectors = { + createButton: '[data-testid="create-facility"]', + nameInput: '[data-testid="facility-name"]' + }; + + createFacility(data: FacilityData): void { + cy.verifyAndClickElement(this.selectors.createButton); + // Implementation... + } +} + describe("Feature Name", () => { - const page = new PageObject(); + const page = new FacilityPage(); const facilityType = "Primary Health Centre"; const testData = generateTestData(); beforeEach(() => { - // Setup + cy.login(); + cy.intercept('GET', '/api/facilities').as('getFacilities'); + cy.visit('/facilities'); + cy.wait('@getFacilities'); }); it("should perform action", () => { page.navigateToOrganization("Kerala"); page.navigateToFacilitiesList(); + + // Create new facility + page.createFacility(testData); + + // Verify creation + cy.get('[data-testid="facility-name"]') + .should('contain', testData.name); }); + + it("should handle errors gracefully", () => { + // Error handling example + cy.intercept('POST', '/api/facilities', { + statusCode: 400, + body: { error: 'Invalid data' } + }).as('createError'); + + page.createFacility(testData); + + // Verify error handling + cy.get('[data-testid="error-message"]') + .should('be.visible') + .and('contain', 'Invalid data'); + }); });cypress/support/commands.ts (1)
211-214: Consider adding data attributes for error messages.The current implementation searches the entire body for error messages, which could match unintended text. Consider:
- Adding data attributes (e.g.,
data-cy="error-message") to error message elements- Using these attributes for more precise targeting
- cy.get("body").within(() => { - errorMessages.forEach((message) => { - cy.contains(message).scrollIntoView().should("be.visible"); - }); + errorMessages.forEach((message) => { + cy.get('[data-cy="error-message"]') + .contains(message) + .scrollIntoView() + .should("be.visible"); + });cypress/docs/best-practices.md (3)
4-6: Add cleanup examples for test independence.Consider adding examples of cleanup patterns to help developers implement proper test isolation:
## Test Independence - Each test should be independent and isolated - Clean up test data after tests - Don't rely on the state from other tests + +Example cleanup pattern: +```typescript +beforeEach(() => { + // Setup test data +}); + +afterEach(() => { + // Clean up created data + cy.task('cleanupTestData'); +}); +```
8-11: Add examples for API testing patterns.Consider adding examples to illustrate the recommended API testing patterns:
## API Testing - Use cy.intercept() for API verification - Use waitUntil() for API completion - Avoid cy.wait() except for API responses + +Example: +```typescript +cy.intercept('POST', '/api/facilities').as('createFacility'); +// Perform action that triggers API call +cy.wait('@createFacility').then((interception) => { + expect(interception.response.statusCode).to.eq(201); +}); +```
20-20: Add "the" before "AAA pattern".Fix the grammar in the Code Organization section.
-Follow AAA pattern (Arrange, Act, Assert) +Follow the AAA pattern (Arrange, Act, Assert)🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~20-~20: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...Keep tests focused and concise - Follow AAA pattern (Arrange, Act, Assert) - Use me...(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts (3)
58-60: Use consistent selector pattern.The selector for features uses an id selector while other methods use data-cy attributes.
selectFeatures(features: string[]) { - cy.clickAndMultiSelectOption("#facility-features", features); + cy.clickAndMultiSelectOption('[data-cy="facility-features"]', features); }
86-93: Make validation error messages configurable.Consider making the error messages configurable to support internationalization and avoid hardcoding.
verifyValidationErrors() { + const errorMessages = { + name: "Name is required", + facilityType: "Facility type is required", + address: "Address is required", + phone: "Phone number must start with +91 followed by 10 digits" + }; cy.verifyErrorMessages([ - "Name is required", - "Facility type is required", - "Address is required", - "Phone number must start with +91 followed by 10 digits", + errorMessages.name, + errorMessages.facilityType, + errorMessages.address, + errorMessages.phone ]); }
99-101: Enhance facility card verification.The current implementation might be fragile if multiple facilities contain similar names.
verifyFacilityNameInCard(facilityName: string) { - cy.get('[data-cy="facility-cards"]').should("contain", facilityName); + cy.get('[data-cy="facility-cards"]') + .find(`[data-cy="facility-name"][title="${facilityName}"]`) + .should("be.visible"); }cypress/docs/file-structure.md (2)
4-18: Add language specification to code fence.Specify the language for the code fence to enable proper syntax highlighting.
-``` +```bash cypress/ ├── docs/ │ ├── README.md🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
4-4: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
37-39: Enhance storage management section with examples.The storage management section would benefit from practical examples.
## Storage Management - Use cy.saveLocalStorage() and cy.restoreLocalStorage() - Manage test data cleanup + +Example: +```typescript +beforeEach(() => { + cy.restoreLocalStorage(); +}); + +afterEach(() => { + cy.saveLocalStorage(); +}); + +after(() => { + // Cleanup test data + cy.task('cleanDatabase'); +}); +```
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (12)
.cursorrules(1 hunks)cypress/docs/best-practices.md(1 hunks)cypress/docs/cypress.md(1 hunks)cypress/docs/file-structure.md(1 hunks)cypress/docs/patterns.md(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/facility_spec/facility_creation.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/login_spec/loginpage.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/e2e/patient_spec/patient_search.cy.ts(1 hunks)cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts(1 hunks)cypress/support/commands.ts(3 hunks)cypress/support/index.ts(1 hunks)public/locale/en.json(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .cursorrules
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- public/locale/en.json
- cypress/e2e/login_spec/loginpage.cy.ts
- cypress/e2e/facility_spec/facility_creation.cy.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/patient_search.cy.ts (1)
Learnt from: nihal467
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9285
File: cypress/e2e/patient_spec/PatientDoctorNotes.cy.ts:17-17
Timestamp: 2024-12-04T07:06:49.613Z
Learning: In `PatientDoctorNotes.cy.ts`, the login methods `loginManuallyAsNurse()` and `loginByRole("nurse")` serve different purposes and approaches. Refactoring `loginManuallyAsNurse()` to use `loginByRole()` is not necessary in this context.
cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts (3)
Learnt from: nihal467
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9846
File: cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts:14-47
Timestamp: 2025-01-09T05:37:17.121Z
Learning: In the care_fe project's Cypress tests, facility test data is managed through the facilityData.ts utility which provides pre-validated data through the FacilityTestData interface, making additional validation in the FacilityCreation page object unnecessary.
Learnt from: Jacobjeevan
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9145
File: cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts:177-180
Timestamp: 2024-11-18T10:44:30.303Z
Learning: In `cypress/e2e/facility_spec/FacilityCreation.cy.ts`, when testing bed and staff capacity individually for additional error verification, we prefer to use separate method calls to handle bed and staff capacity, rather than using `facilityPage.createNewFacility(testFacilityData)` which also handles bed management.
Learnt from: nihal467
PR: ohcnetwork/care_fe#9846
File: cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts:18-23
Timestamp: 2025-01-08T10:57:45.377Z
Learning: In the facility creation form, the facility type dropdown is hardcoded and its options are always available, making additional error handling unnecessary.
🪛 LanguageTool
cypress/docs/best-practices.md
[uncategorized] ~20-~20: You might be missing the article “the” here.
Context: ...Keep tests focused and concise - Follow AAA pattern (Arrange, Act, Assert) - Use me...
(AI_EN_LECTOR_MISSING_DETERMINER_THE)
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
cypress/docs/file-structure.md
4-4: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified
(MD040, fenced-code-language)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: Cloudflare Pages: care-fe
🔇 Additional comments (5)
cypress/support/index.ts (1)
7-7: Verify updates to existing test files.The
loginByApimethod signature has changed from accepting username/password to accepting a role parameter. This change requires updates to all existing test files using this method.Let's verify the impact:
cypress/docs/cypress.md (2)
12-16: LGTM! These principles directly support the facility creation tests.The principles are well-defined and particularly relevant for the facility creation tests in this PR:
- Using data-cy attributes will make the facility form tests more reliable
- Page Object Model pattern will help organize the facility creation page logic
- TypeScript usage will ensure type safety for facility data
6-9: Verify the existence of referenced documentation files.The quick links section references three markdown files. Let's ensure they exist in the repository.
✅ Verification successful
All referenced documentation files exist ✓
The quick links are correctly pointing to existing documentation files in the repository.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the referenced documentation files exist for file in "file-structure.md" "patterns.md" "best-practices.md"; do echo "Checking for cypress/docs/$file..." if [ ! -f "cypress/docs/$file" ]; then echo "Warning: $file not found" fi doneLength of output: 638
cypress/e2e/patient_spec/patient_search.cy.ts (1)
12-13: LGTM! Login implementation aligns with established patterns.The shift to using
loginByApiis consistent with our learnings about different login approaches serving different purposes.cypress/pageObject/facility/FacilityCreation.ts (1)
77-79: Verify custom command type definition.Ensure that the
clickSubmitButtoncommand is properly typed incypress/support/commands.ts.✅ Verification successful
Command is properly typed ✅
The
clickSubmitButtoncommand is correctly typed incypress/support/index.tswith proper parameter and return types, and its implementation incypress/support/commands.tsmatches the type definition.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if clickSubmitButton command is defined rg -A 5 "Cypress.Commands.add\('clickSubmitButton'" cypress/support/Length of output: 76
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any mention of clickSubmitButton in cypress/support rg "clickSubmitButton" cypress/support/ # Find type definition files fd "\.d\.ts$" cypress/Length of output: 254
|
@nihal467 Your efforts have helped advance digital healthcare and TeleICU systems. 🚀 Thank you for taking the time out to make CARE better. We hope you continue to innovate and contribute; your impact is immense! 🙌 |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Testing Improvements
Chores