Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Option for Storage Class #35

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 19, 2017
Merged

Option for Storage Class #35

merged 4 commits into from
Sep 19, 2017

Conversation

laughedelic
Copy link
Contributor

@laughedelic laughedelic commented Sep 19, 2017 •
edited
Loading

@ambahk:

Are there any options to use reduced redundancy storage? Thanks.

@laughedelic
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ambahk.
We don't have this feature yet. But if you want to contribute to the project, take a look at the ohnosequences/ivy-s3-resolver project, there are internals of this plugin. Probably this pull-request can be useful as an example: ohnosequences/ivy-s3-resolver#8

@laughedelic laughedelic mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2017
Merged
@laughedelic laughedelic self-assigned this Sep 19, 2017
@laughedelic laughedelic changed the title Option to use RRS Option for Storage Class Sep 19, 2017
@laughedelic
Copy link
Contributor

Hey @ambahk! Good news! (better late than never 😉 )
I added s3storageClass setting, so that you can set it like

s3storageClass := com.amazonaws.services.s3.model.StorageClass.ReducedRedundancy

Note, that there are some other options for setting StorageClass, besides standard and reduced-redundancy: docs

@laughedelic laughedelic merged commit 63fd6c2 into master Sep 19, 2017
@laughedelic laughedelic deleted the 35/storage-class branch September 19, 2017 01:47
@laughedelic laughedelic mentioned this pull request Sep 19, 2017
Closed
@laughedelic
Copy link
Contributor

This feature is released in v0.17.0. Note, that sinse this version the plugin is published to Bintray and only for sbt-1.0. Check readme for usage.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees

@laughedelic laughedelic

Labels
feature
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@laughedelic