Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update slf4j monorepo to v2.0.16 #37

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Aug 6, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
org.slf4j:slf4j-simple (source, changelog) 2.0.13 -> 2.0.16 age adoption passing confidence
org.slf4j:slf4j-api (source, changelog) 2.0.13 -> 2.0.16 age adoption passing confidence

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about these updates again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/slf4j-monorepo branch from ad9ec3c to 1df192b Compare August 8, 2024 16:41
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update slf4j monorepo to v2.0.14 fix(deps): update slf4j monorepo to v2.0.15 Aug 8, 2024
@renovate renovate bot changed the title fix(deps): update slf4j monorepo to v2.0.15 fix(deps): update slf4j monorepo to v2.0.16 Aug 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants