Prep release

[jburel]

• Add missing license file (reference in MANIFEST.in)
• Add changelog
• Ignore build

cc @joshmoore

[jburel]

Any objections to merge it now
and tag 0.1.0?

[sbesson]

None from me, thanks for adjusting the readme. Should we have sign off from the team on Monday before releasing?

[jburel]

For the license file?. We can always move it and retag.
the rest has been signed off including the name that we are going to keep as it is

[sbesson]

No, the license is fine as it is.

Re release, I was under the impression this project was still an ongoing investigation in the context ome/omero-documentation#2123 (comment). If the questions around its scope and name have been discussed and settled, then it's fine and I missed this conversation and its outcome. Has a brief summary of the decisions been published somewhere?

[jburel]

As indicated on the doc PR, having the "meta-package" should simplify the releases since adding for example a dependency to the meta-package should not require a doc or omero-install.
This actually simplifies the release process.
So we all agree that it was a good approach, the initial worry was the work required but since we now have everything in place and it works for the various linux flavours
we should be good to go

[jburel]

Just noticed version in file.
Quick discussion tomorrow before tagging