Skip to content

[CMDBUF][L0] Use copy engine to optimize cmd-buffer usage#1738

Merged
kbenzie merged 1 commit intooneapi-src:mainfrom
Bensuo:cmd-buf-copy-queue
Jun 14, 2024
Merged

[CMDBUF][L0] Use copy engine to optimize cmd-buffer usage#1738
kbenzie merged 1 commit intooneapi-src:mainfrom
Bensuo:cmd-buf-copy-queue

Conversation

@Bensuo
Copy link
Contributor

@Bensuo Bensuo commented Jun 10, 2024

  • Out-of-order command-buffers now use copy-engine in some cases where available
  • Also respect existing L0 env vars for using copy-engine with fill and d2d copies

@Bensuo Bensuo added experimental Experimental feature additions/changes/specification command-buffer Command Buffer feature addition/changes/specification labels Jun 10, 2024
@Bensuo Bensuo requested a review from a team as a code owner June 10, 2024 13:12
@Bensuo
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bensuo commented Jun 10, 2024

DPC++ PR: intel/llvm#13051

@Bensuo Bensuo force-pushed the cmd-buf-copy-queue branch from 690814d to 76f84a1 Compare June 10, 2024 13:46
@github-actions github-actions bot added the level-zero L0 adapter specific issues label Jun 10, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@EwanC EwanC left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

- Out-of-order command-buffers now use copy-engine in some cases where available
- Also respect existing L0 env vars for using copy-engine with fill and d2d copies
@Bensuo Bensuo force-pushed the cmd-buf-copy-queue branch from c4f5aeb to 30f8ac5 Compare June 12, 2024 11:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

command-buffer Command Buffer feature addition/changes/specification experimental Experimental feature additions/changes/specification level-zero L0 adapter specific issues

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

Comments