Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: added support for azure blob storage #110

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 7, 2021

Conversation

Vafilor
Copy link
Contributor

@Vafilor Vafilor commented Jan 6, 2021

What this PR does:

Adds support for azure blob storage

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes onepanelio/core#

Special notes for your reviewer:

@Vafilor Vafilor added this to the v0.18.0 milestone Jan 6, 2021
@Vafilor Vafilor self-assigned this Jan 6, 2021
@Vafilor Vafilor marked this pull request as draft January 6, 2021 22:30
@@ -21,6 +21,6 @@ spec:
- azure
envFrom:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's better to set the env like this:

env:
  - name: MINIO_ACCESS_KEY
    valueFrom:
      secretKeyRef:
        name: onepanel
        key: artifactRepositoryS3AccessKey
  - name: MINIO_SECRET_KEY
    valueFrom:
      secretKeyRef:
        name: onepanel
        key: artifactRepositoryS3SecretKey

That way you don't have to do this

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rushtehrani Ahh, good point. Much cleaner.

@rushtehrani rushtehrani modified the milestones: v0.18.0, v0.17.0 Jan 7, 2021
@Vafilor Vafilor marked this pull request as ready for review January 7, 2021 18:01
@Vafilor Vafilor merged commit b11897e into master Jan 7, 2021
@Vafilor Vafilor deleted the feature/azure.blob.storage branch January 7, 2021 18:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants