Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consolidate decoding of EVM.TransactionExecuted event for the contained transaction & receipt #354

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2024

Conversation

m-Peter
Copy link
Collaborator

@m-Peter m-Peter commented Jul 16, 2024

Closes: #349

Description

The decodeTransactionEvent now decodes the given EVM.TransactionExecuted event, and returns both a Transaction and a StorageReceipt object.


For contributor use:

  • Targeted PR against master branch
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the standards mentioned here.
  • Updated relevant documentation
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Added appropriate labels

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor

    • Simplified the transaction event decoding process for improved efficiency.
    • Consolidated receipt and transaction decoding into a single function call.
  • Tests

    • Updated test functions to accommodate changes in transaction and receipt decoding logic.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 16, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes consolidate the decoding process of EVM.TransactionExecuted events in the system. Previously, decoding the transaction and receipt was done separately, causing redundancy. Now, the decodeTransactionEvent function handles both tasks, streamlining the process and improving efficiency. The changes affect multiple files, primarily within the models, adjusting function signatures and import statements accordingly.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
models/events.go Updated Transactions method to use decodeTransactionEvent for combined decoding of transactions and receipts.
models/receipt.go Removed redundant imports and the decodeReceipt function related to receipt decoding.
models/transaction.go Refactored decodeTransaction to decodeTransactionEvent, updating the decoding logic and error handling.
models/receipt_test.go Updated tests to reflect the new return values of decodeTransactionEvent.
models/transaction_test.go Modified test functions to accommodate changes in decodeTransactionEvent return values.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant C as CadenceEvents
    participant D as Decoder
    participant T as Transaction
    participant R as StorageReceipt

    C->>D: Transactions()
    loop for each event
        D->>D: decodeTransactionEvent(e.Value)
        D->>C: Transaction, Receipt
        C->>T: Add Transaction
        C->>R: Add Receipt
    end
Loading

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Consolidate decoding of transaction and receipt from EVM.TransactionExecuted event (#349)

Poem

In the code where data flows,
Decoding twice now overthrows,
With decodeTransactionEvent in place,
We've streamlined logic, saved some space.
Transactions and receipts in one go,
Efficiency and clarity, watch them grow! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
models/receipt.go (1)

Line range hint 1-100: Confirm relevance of remaining functionality post-refactoring.

With the removal of the decodeReceipt function and related imports, ensure that the remaining functionality in models/receipt.go is still relevant and correctly implemented. Consider whether further refactoring or removal of outdated code is necessary to align with the new architecture.

models/transaction_test.go (1)

90-90: Refactored function call needs verification.

The call to decodeTransactionEvent now expects only one event parameter and returns three values. Ensure that all calls to this function have been updated accordingly in the following files:

  • models/receipt_test.go
  • models/events.go
Analysis chain

Refactored function call needs verification.

The call to decodeTransactionEvent now expects only one event parameter and returns two values. Ensure that all calls to this function have been updated accordingly across the codebase.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `decodeTransactionEvent` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature.
rg --type go -A 5 $'decodeTransactionEvent'

Length of output: 2831

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8009cc2 and 47c9c7d.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • models/events.go (1 hunks)
  • models/receipt.go (2 hunks)
  • models/receipt_test.go (1 hunks)
  • models/transaction.go (3 hunks)
  • models/transaction_test.go (5 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (6)
models/events.go (1)

75-81: Review updated transaction decoding logic.

The Transactions method now uses decodeTransactionEvent to decode transaction events. Ensure that the method correctly handles errors and integrates the transaction and receipt objects into the system. Additionally, verify that this change simplifies the logic and improves efficiency as intended.

Verification successful

Integration and error handling of decodeTransactionEvent verified.

The decodeTransactionEvent function is correctly integrated into the Transactions method of the CadenceEvents struct with proper error handling. The logic is simplified and efficient as intended.

  • models/events.go: Proper integration and error handling observed.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration of `decodeTransactionEvent` in the system.

# Test: Search for the function usage and related error handling. Expect: Proper integration and error handling.
rg --type go -A 5 $'decodeTransactionEvent'

Length of output: 2831


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the integration and error handling of `decodeTransactionEvent` in models/events.go.

# Test: Search for the function usage and related error handling in models/events.go. Expect: Proper integration and error handling.
rg --type go -A 5 -B 5 $'decodeTransactionEvent' models/events.go

Length of output: 424

models/transaction.go (1)

185-265: Thoroughly review the refactored decodeTransactionEvent function.

The decodeTransactionEvent function has been significantly refactored with enhanced error handling and decoding logic. Ensure that the function is robust, handles errors appropriately, and integrates well with the existing system. Also, verify that the added complexity is justified by the benefits of consolidation.

Verification successful

The decodeTransactionEvent function is robust and well-integrated.

The function has been thoroughly tested in transaction_test.go and receipt_test.go, covering various scenarios and edge cases. Additionally, its integration in events.go demonstrates proper error handling and system integration.

  • Tests in transaction_test.go and receipt_test.go ensure robust error handling and correct type assertions.
  • Integration in events.go confirms its role in processing events and handling errors.
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the robustness and integration of the `decodeTransactionEvent` function.

# Test: Search for error handling patterns and integration points. Expect: Robust error handling and system integration.
rg --type go -A 10 $'decodeTransactionEvent'

Length of output: 4926


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Gather detailed information about tests and integration for `decodeTransactionEvent` function.

# Search for the tests in `receipt_test.go` and `transaction_test.go` that involve `decodeTransactionEvent`.
rg --type go -A 10 'decodeTransactionEvent' models/receipt_test.go models/transaction_test.go

# Check the integration in `events.go` to understand the broader context.
rg --type go -A 10 'decodeTransactionEvent' models/events.go

Length of output: 3902

models/transaction_test.go (4)

238-238: Refactored function call needs verification.

This test also uses the updated decodeTransactionEvent function. It is crucial to verify that all such calls are correctly updated to match the new signature and that the handling of returned values is consistent across the codebase.

Verification successful

Refactored function call verification successful.

All instances of decodeTransactionEvent in the codebase match the new signature and handle the returned values correctly.

  • models/receipt_test.go: Line 1
  • models/transaction_test.go: Lines 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
  • models/events.go: Line 1
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `decodeTransactionEvent` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature.
rg --type go -A 5 $'decodeTransactionEvent'

Length of output: 2831


184-184: Refactored function call needs verification.

Ensure that the decodeTransactionEvent function is called correctly with the updated parameters and that the handling of returned values is consistent with the new function signature.

Verification successful

Function call verification successful.

The decodeTransactionEvent function is called correctly across the codebase with the updated parameters, and the handling of returned values is consistent with the new function signature.

  • models/transaction_test.go
  • models/receipt_test.go
  • models/events.go
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `decodeTransactionEvent` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature.
rg --type go -A 5 $'decodeTransactionEvent'

Length of output: 2831


136-136: Refactored function call needs verification.

Similar to the previous test, the call to decodeTransactionEvent here also needs to be verified to ensure that it matches the new signature across all instances in the codebase.


290-290: Refactored function call needs verification.

As with previous cases, verify that the decodeTransactionEvent function is called with the correct parameters and that the handling of returned values aligns with the new function signature.

Verification successful

The verification confirms that the decodeTransactionEvent function is consistently called with the correct parameter and that the returned values are handled appropriately.

  • File: models/transaction_test.go
  • Lines: 290-290

The refactored function call to decodeTransactionEvent is correct.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all function calls to `decodeTransactionEvent` match the new signature.

# Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: Only occurances of the new signature.
rg --type go -A 5 $'decodeTransactionEvent'

Length of output: 2831

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ import (
func Test_DecodeReceipts(t *testing.T) {
cdcEv, rec := createTestEvent(t, evmTxBinary)

receipt, err := decodeReceipt(cdcEv)
_, receipt, err := decodeTransactionEvent(cdcEv)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ensure comprehensive testing for decodeTransactionEvent.

The test function Test_DecodeReceipts uses the new decodeTransactionEvent function but only checks for no errors and compares logs. Consider adding more assertions to validate the Transaction object and other aspects of the Receipt object to ensure comprehensive testing.

Would you like me to help by adding more test cases or enhancing the existing ones?

Copy link
Contributor

@sideninja sideninja left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice cleanup

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consolidate decoding of transaction and receipt from EVM.TransactionExecuted event
2 participants