Pending transaction event from pool #374
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes improve the transaction handling mechanisms across various components of the system, emphasizing a more integrated approach. Key modifications include refining the types used in transaction processing, streamlining the event ingestion engine, and enhancing the transaction pool for better publishing of events. These updates collectively enhance clarity, efficiency, and the overall capability of transaction management within the application. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant API
participant TxPool
participant EVM
participant Engine
API->>TxPool: Publish transaction
TxPool->>EVM: Pass transaction for processing
EVM->>Engine: Notify about the processing
Engine-->>TxPool: Acknowledge receipt
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- api/stream.go (1 hunks)
- bootstrap/bootstrap.go (2 hunks)
- services/ingestion/engine.go (3 hunks)
- services/ingestion/engine_test.go (5 hunks)
- services/requester/pool.go (2 hunks)
- services/requester/requester.go (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- services/ingestion/engine_test.go
Additional comments not posted (10)
services/requester/pool.go (3)
28-31: LGTM!The addition of the
txPublisherfield to theTxPoolstruct enhances its functionality by enabling transaction event publishing.
35-44: LGTM!The
NewTxPoolconstructor correctly initializes the newtxPublisherfield, ensuring proper integration of the transaction event publishing functionality.
57-58: LGTM!The addition of the
Publishcall within theSendmethod ensures that pending transactions are broadcasted as intended.api/stream.go (1)
102-111: LGTM!The changes to the
NewPendingTransactionsmethod improve clarity and efficiency by refining type usage and simplifying control flow.services/ingestion/engine.go (3)
20-30: LGTM!The removal of the
transactionsPublisherfield simplifies theEnginestruct, potentially streamlining event processing.
47-56: LGTM!The
NewEventIngestionEngineconstructor correctly removes thetransactionsPublisherparameter and its corresponding assignment, ensuring proper integration of the simplifiedEnginestruct.
181-181: LGTM!The removal of the index variable
ifrom the loop iterating overreceiptssimplifies the loop logic, aligning with the overall modifications.bootstrap/bootstrap.go (2)
288-297: Verify the creation and usage oftxPool.The
txPoolis created usingrequester.NewTxPooland passed to therequester.NewEVMfunction. Ensure that this change aligns with the new transaction handling logic.Verification successful
The creation and usage of
txPoolhave been verified and are correct.
- The
txPoolis created usingrequester.NewTxPool.- It is correctly passed to
requester.NewEVMas a parameter.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the creation and usage of the `txPool` in the `startServer` function. # Test: Search for the function definition and usage. Expect: Proper creation and usage of `txPool`. rg --type go 'txPool := requester.NewTxPool'Length of output: 139
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of `txPool` in the `requester.NewEVM` function. # Search for the definition of the `requester.NewEVM` function. rg --type go 'func NewEVM' -A 10 # Search for the usage of `txPool` within the `requester.NewEVM` function. rg --type go 'NewEVM' -A 10Length of output: 2016
Line range hint
78-99:
Verify the removal oftransactionsPublisherparameter.The
transactionsPublisherparameter has been removed from thestartIngestionfunction. Ensure that this change aligns with the new transaction handling logic.Verification successful
Verified: The
transactionsPublisherparameter has been removed from thestartIngestionfunction.
- The function definition does not include the
transactionsPublisherparameter.- The function call aligns with the new definition.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the removal of the `transactionsPublisher` parameter from the `startIngestion` function. # Test: Search for the function definition and usage. Expect: No references to `transactionsPublisher`. rg --type go 'startIngestion'Length of output: 119
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the function definition and its parameters, as well as the function call for `startIngestion`. # Extract the function definition with context lines rg --type go -A 10 'func startIngestion' bootstrap/bootstrap.go # Extract the function call with context lines rg --type go -B 5 -A 5 'startIngestion(' bootstrap/bootstrap.goLength of output: 542
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the function definition and its parameters, as well as the function call for `startIngestion`. # Extract the function definition with context lines rg --type go -A 10 'func startIngestion' bootstrap/bootstrap.go # Extract the function call with context lines rg --type go -B 5 -A 5 'startIngestion\(' bootstrap/bootstrap.goLength of output: 794
services/requester/requester.go (1)
Line range hint
116-168:
Verify the integration oftxPoolparameter.The
txPoolparameter has been added to theNewEVMfunction. Ensure that thetxPoolis properly integrated and utilized within the function.Verification successful
The
txPoolparameter is properly integrated into theNewEVMfunction.The
txPoolparameter is assigned to thetxPoolfield of theEVMstruct, indicating correct utilization. No issues found with the integration.
services/requester/requester.go,NewEVMfunctionScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the integration of the `txPool` parameter in the `NewEVM` function. # Test: Search for the function definition and usage. Expect: Proper integration and usage of `txPool`. rg --type go 'func NewEVM'Length of output: 73
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the body of the `NewEVM` function to verify the integration of the `txPool` parameter. # Extract the `NewEVM` function body from `services/requester/requester.go`. ast-grep --lang go --pattern $'func NewEVM($_) ($_, $_) { $$$ }' services/requester/requester.goLength of output: 99
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the body of the `NewEVM` function to verify the integration of the `txPool` parameter. # Search for the `NewEVM` function definition and include additional context lines to capture the function body. rg --type go 'func NewEVM' -A 50 services/requester/requester.goLength of output: 1620
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract the complete body of the `NewEVM` function to verify the integration of the `txPool` parameter. # Search for the `NewEVM` function definition and include more context lines to capture the complete function body. rg --type go 'func NewEVM' -A 100 services/requester/requester.goLength of output: 3134
Description
Changes the pending transaction event source to the pool. This is the correct way to emit pending transactions, not like before once they were already ingested as executed.
For contributor use:
masterbranchFiles changedin the Github PR explorerSummary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
NewPendingTransactionsmethod for better performance and clarity.Refactor
Tests