-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 180
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Ledger] Replace LRU cache with a FIFO queue (circular buffer) #2893
Merged
ramtinms
merged 11 commits into
fxamacker/reuse-mtrie-state-for-checkpointing-2
from
ramtin/replace-ledger-forest-lru-cache
Aug 2, 2022
Merged
Changes from 6 commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
955c1f5
replace lru cache with fifo buffer
ramtinms eac058c
no need to capture trie remove wals
ramtinms 0f18591
Applying PR's comment
ramtinms 9079607
rename files
ramtinms 46c81ba
doc update
ramtinms 8fb31d4
add test for PurgeCacheExcept
ramtinms c36ddc3
apply PR's comments
ramtinms c1dc91f
add more tests for purge
ramtinms 02fc84c
add a simple test for concurrent access
ramtinms a9efa31
code optimization
ramtinms 77f4e55
remove unrelavant tests
ramtinms File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
With removal of removal, maybe we can get out of it completely, remove
WALDelete
(andWALUpdate
since now we have only one operation, and all related codeThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we need it for reading old WALs when we spork, we could get rid of it after next spork.