Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Chunk Data Model supports per-chunk service event mapping #6744
Chunk Data Model supports per-chunk service event mapping #6744
Changes from 29 commits
e59dc76
869feff
6e4c8de
d383068
97515e8
ec7c74e
e906251
b9849c6
8961e51
5579f2a
f1125b3
718a5ee
44f3c1a
13aba21
defcdea
405626e
447017b
e465bbc
140b324
49bcbf6
176100f
ee99871
4d40dcf
9b7735e
ad346e8
b484203
a61e30e
6fe51f6
4a651b6
4a27b73
e1ee2f0
9c1ef70
9a10320
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we maybe want to move this to the beginning of the Chunk Body? I think conceptually, that would be more consistent.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree, but RLP encoding depends on field ordering within structs, so doing this would change the ID computation (unless we over-rode again, using the RLP encoding).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Added a test case to validate this a61e30e
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Would be great if we explicitly documented how this code is going to be updated.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can remove the
EncodeRLP
method entirely instead. The other branch is essentially the default RLP behaviour.