Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

dianna package: eXplainable AI for ONNX models (XAI4ONNX) #291

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 15, 2024

Conversation

elboyran
Copy link
Contributor

@elboyran elboyran commented Jun 21, 2024

Description

  • Added an overview tutorial for the DIANNA (Deep Insight and Neural Network Analysis) package and a link in the README

Motivation and Context

  • This informs the ONNX community about an eXplainable AI (XAI) tool for their ONNX models

@elboyran elboyran marked this pull request as ready for review June 21, 2024 09:37
@elboyran
Copy link
Contributor Author

elboyran commented Jun 21, 2024

Indicating Ramakrishnan Sivakumar and Javier Martinez as reviewers as advised in the Slack thread.

elboyran and others added 2 commits June 21, 2024 11:44
Added link to the dianna (XAI for ONNX models) overview tutorial.

Signed-off-by: Elena Ranguelova <E.Ranguelova@esciencecenter.nl>
Signed-off-by: elboyran <e.ranguelova@esciencecenter.nl>
…r ONNX models

Signed-off-by: elboyran <e.ranguelova@esciencecenter.nl>
@elboyran elboyran changed the title Xai4onnx dianna package for eXplainable AI for ONNX models dianna package: eXplainable AI for ONNX models (XAI4ONNX) Jun 21, 2024
@ramkrishna2910
Copy link

Looks good to me. Please wait for @javier-intel to approve as well.

@elboyran
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ramkrishna2910 and @javier-intel thank you for the approval.
I do not have write access to be able to merge the PR.

@andife
Copy link
Member

andife commented Jul 15, 2024

I wonder if the urls should be improved? At least some checks fail.

@elboyran
Copy link
Contributor Author

elboyran commented Jul 15, 2024

I will try to fix those. (All checks were passing when I first submitted the PR.)

@elboyran elboyran marked this pull request as draft July 15, 2024 09:53
Signed-off-by: Ranguelova Elena <E.Ranguelova@esciencecenter.nl>
@elboyran elboyran marked this pull request as ready for review July 15, 2024 10:58
@elboyran
Copy link
Contributor Author

@andife, @ramkrishna2910, @javier-intel I see now the previously failing workflow is expecting approval.

@javier-intel
Copy link

Hi @elboyran there still appear to be a couple of failures in the last log. Were this the same or are they new ones?

@elboyran
Copy link
Contributor Author

Hi @elboyran there still appear to be a couple of failures in the last log. Were this the same or are they new ones?

Some are the same, but it's hard for me to judge which are considered insecure URLs. I removed some I thought they might be. Some URL checks still fail without pointing to specific ones. Shall I remove all then (they are pointing to data and papers to explainers)?

Please, note that some checks fail not from my tutorial, but from the repo's README.md (which I modified only with a link to my tutorial).

Signed-off-by: Ranguelova Elena <E.Ranguelova@esciencecenter.nl>
@elboyran
Copy link
Contributor Author

elboyran commented Jul 15, 2024

Hi @javier-intel , I have removed the links. If it fails again, I hope it is not due to my notebook.
[Some links failed before in the README, not from my edits.]

@javier-intel
Copy link

There are 3 issues flagged by the validation tool. Those are in the main branch and unrelated to your changes so they shouldn't block the PR. I'll merge the changes and fix the 404 flagged by the tool separately at a later time.

@javier-intel javier-intel merged commit 3a0d50a into onnx:main Jul 15, 2024
1 of 2 checks passed
@elboyran
Copy link
Contributor Author

elboyran commented Jul 15, 2024 via email

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants