Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added onos-e2t chart #81

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2020
Merged

Added onos-e2t chart #81

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 1, 2020

Conversation

SeanCondon
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@SeanCondon SeanCondon self-assigned this Sep 1, 2020
ports:
- name: sctp
containerPort: {{.Values.sctp.port}}
startupProbe:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice!

release: "{{ .Release.Name }}"
heritage: "{{ .Release.Service }}"
data:
logging.yaml: |-
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We need to have access to an Atomix database in this service, right? For that, we'll want to add an onos.yaml configuration as well, e.g.:
https://github.com/onosproject/sdran-helm-charts/blob/master/onos-ric/templates/configmap.yaml#L15

I guess it's not needed yet, but should we add it now or later?

service:
# TODO: External NodePort service should be disabled by default
external:
nodePort:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this valid YAML?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep - empty object

Copy link
Contributor

@kuujo kuujo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me. Just need to decide whether we want to add a store configuration in the initial codes or not.

@SeanCondon
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'd rather wait for the store configuration until we need it

@kuujo
Copy link
Contributor

kuujo commented Sep 1, 2020

Fair enough.

@SeanCondon SeanCondon merged commit 6c34f53 into onosproject:master Sep 1, 2020
@SeanCondon SeanCondon deleted the scOnosE2t branch September 1, 2020 10:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants