Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

162 consider removing flow type #173

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 18, 2017
Merged

162 consider removing flow type #173

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 18, 2017

Conversation

phyrog
Copy link
Contributor

@phyrog phyrog commented Oct 18, 2017

Removes flow-type.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 18, 2017 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #173 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #173   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.15%   96.15%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         156      156           
  Branches       22       22           
=======================================
  Hits          150      150           
  Misses          5        5           
  Partials        1        1

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1bcff36...f3f0d7f. Read the comment docs.

@phyrog phyrog requested a review from eugenk October 18, 2017 13:23
eugenk
eugenk approved these changes Oct 18, 2017
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@eugenk eugenk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@phyrog phyrog merged commit 430e944 into master Oct 18, 2017
@phyrog phyrog deleted the 162-consider_removing_flow-type branch October 18, 2017 13:28
@phyrog phyrog mentioned this pull request Oct 18, 2017
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@eugenk eugenk eugenk approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@phyrog @eugenk