Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor(netxlite): use *Netx for creating HTTP transports #1253

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 12, 2023

Conversation

bassosimone
Copy link
Contributor

@bassosimone bassosimone commented Sep 12, 2023

This diff is like 50279a7 but uses *Netx to create HTTP transports.

While there, annotate a test that is notoriously flaky on Windows.

The general idea of this patchset is to ensure we're not using duplicate code for constructing netxlite types, which is good to do now, because we're about to introduce new netxlite types for the network with which we communicate with the OONI backend.

Reference issue: ooni/probe#2531

This diff is like 50279a7 but uses *Netx to create HTTP transports.

The general idea of this patchset is to ensure we're not using duplicate code for constructing netxlite types, which is good to do now, because we're about to introduce new netxlite types for the network with which we communicate with the OONI backend.

Reference issue: ooni/probe#2531
@bassosimone bassosimone merged commit 84bf85a into master Sep 12, 2023
6 of 8 checks passed
@bassosimone bassosimone deleted the issue/2531 branch September 12, 2023 08:08
Murphy-OrangeMud pushed a commit to Murphy-OrangeMud/probe-cli that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
This diff is like
ooni@50279a7
but uses *Netx to create HTTP transports.

While there, annotate a test that is notoriously flaky on Windows.

The general idea of this patchset is to ensure we're not using duplicate
code for constructing netxlite types, which is good to do now, because
we're about to introduce new netxlite types for the network with which
we communicate with the OONI backend.

Reference issue: ooni/probe#2531
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant