Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(enginenetx): introduce beacons policy #1302

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 26, 2023
Merged

Conversation

bassosimone
Copy link
Contributor

The beacons policy generates tactics sending on the wire SNI values that should be okay for specific domains.

This policy also uses a fallback policy to generate more standard tactics using the DNS, but those tactics have lower priority meaning that we try using beacons first.

When there is no beacon for a domain, this policy immediately falls back to the underlying fallback policy.

Part of ooni/probe#2531

The beacons policy generates tactics sending on the wire SNI
values that should be okay for specific domains.

This policy also uses a fallback policy to generate more standard
tactics using the DNS, but those tactics have lower priority meaning
that we try using beacons first.

When there is no beacon for a domain, this policy immediately
falls back to the underlying fallback policy.

Part of ooni/probe#2531
@bassosimone bassosimone merged commit c1a367c into master Sep 26, 2023
6 checks passed
@bassosimone bassosimone deleted the issue/2531-small branch September 26, 2023 08:15
Murphy-OrangeMud pushed a commit to Murphy-OrangeMud/probe-cli that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
The beacons policy generates tactics sending on the wire SNI values that
should be okay for specific domains.

This policy also uses a fallback policy to generate more standard
tactics using the DNS, but those tactics have lower priority meaning
that we try using beacons first.

When there is no beacon for a domain, this policy immediately falls back
to the underlying fallback policy.

Part of ooni/probe#2531
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant