Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

cleanup(ArchivalTLSOrQUICHandshakeResult): use ArchivalBinaryData #1324

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 28, 2023

Conversation

bassosimone
Copy link
Contributor

This diff modifies model.ArchivalBinaryData to always use ArchivalBinaryData for representing certificates rather than passing through the more complex (and unneeded in this case!) model.ArchivalMaybeBinaryData.

Closes ooni/probe#2165

Part of ooni/probe#2531

This diff modifies model.ArchivalBinaryData to always use ArchivalBinaryData
for representing certificates rather than passing through the more complex
(and unneeded in this case!) model.ArchivalMaybeBinaryData.

Closes ooni/probe#2165

Part of ooni/probe#2531
@bassosimone bassosimone merged commit f29d628 into master Sep 28, 2023
6 checks passed
@bassosimone bassosimone deleted the issue/2531 branch September 28, 2023 12:42
Murphy-OrangeMud pushed a commit to Murphy-OrangeMud/probe-cli that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
…ni#1324)

This diff modifies model.ArchivalBinaryData to always use
ArchivalBinaryData for representing certificates rather than passing
through the more complex (and unneeded in this case!)
model.ArchivalMaybeBinaryData.

Closes ooni/probe#2165

Part of ooni/probe#2531
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

engine: define a model.BinaryData type
1 participant