Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: move webconnectivitylte algos to webconnectivityalgo #1496

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 8, 2024

Conversation

bassosimone
Copy link
Contributor

This diff refactors webconnectivitylte by moving some algorithms inside the new webconnectivityalgo package.

In subsequent commits, we'll seize the opportunity of adding tests for these algorithms, refactor the code, and add specific tests.

Part of ooni/probe#2669.

While there, recognize that the webconnectivityqa package does not belong to internal/experiment but to internal.

This diff refactors webconnectivitylte by moving some algorithms inside
the new webconnectivityalgo package.

In subsequent commits, we'll seize the opportunity of adding tests for
these algorithms, refactor the code, and add specific tests.

Part of ooni/probe#2669.

While there, recognize that the webconnectivityqa package does not
belong to internal/experiment but to internal.
@bassosimone bassosimone requested a review from hellais as a code owner February 8, 2024 07:33
@bassosimone bassosimone merged commit a6f3ca4 into master Feb 8, 2024
25 checks passed
@bassosimone bassosimone deleted the issue/2669c branch February 8, 2024 07:45
Murphy-OrangeMud pushed a commit to Murphy-OrangeMud/probe-cli that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
…1496)

This diff refactors webconnectivitylte by moving some algorithms inside
the new webconnectivityalgo package.

In subsequent commits, we'll seize the opportunity of adding tests for
these algorithms, refactor the code, and add specific tests.

Part of ooni/probe#2669.

While there, recognize that the webconnectivityqa package does not
belong to internal/experiment but to internal.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant