Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ensuring completion-listener.ts listen to a single close event emitte… #464
Ensuring completion-listener.ts listen to a single close event emitte… #464
Changes from 4 commits
37156a9
2eee2c2
5c9b16f
f5dd736
1c03da7
9c8edfb
f81fa00
bfd2094
6992c26
c86d247
54818fb
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
exitCode
is never null here. You need to look at the event's command for the current stateThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yea good point 👍 This means to access it we would need to either add it to the
CommandInfo
which I assume we don't want as it's a public interface or send it explicitly right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Heya, I've fixed this myself and added an extra test too.
You were right, adding to
CommandInfo
is not a good idea, but so wasn't right to pass the state in the close event since that's pretty static. Can checkcommands
variable just outside the loop, though.