Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conditionally clean up Gatekeeper Constraints #43

Conversation

dhaiducek
Copy link
Member

Listing Gatekeeper Constraints was refreshing the discovery API. This adds a global boolean to only attempt cleanup when a Constraint was previously synced successfully.

JustinKuli
JustinKuli previously approved these changes Apr 3, 2023
Copy link
Member

@JustinKuli JustinKuli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/hold for @mprahl

LGTM! It's easier than I would have expected to transition the global back to false, so that's really nice.

@dhaiducek
Copy link
Member Author

/unhold

@dhaiducek dhaiducek force-pushed the gate-gatekeeper branch 2 times, most recently from 7da2697 to a2c7f1d Compare April 3, 2023 15:14
@mprahl
Copy link
Member

mprahl commented Apr 4, 2023

/hold for an additional comment

Copy link
Member

@mprahl mprahl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just one more comment.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the lgtm label Apr 4, 2023
Listing Gk ConstraintTemlates was refreshing the discovery API. This
adds a global boolean to only attempt cleanup when a Constraint was
previously synced successfully.

Signed-off-by: Dale Haiducek <19750917+dhaiducek@users.noreply.github.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm label Apr 4, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 4, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dhaiducek, mprahl

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@mprahl
Copy link
Member

mprahl commented Apr 4, 2023

/unhold

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants