-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 46
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Deprecate packages on record packages #920
Labels
Focus - Packages
Relating to release packages and record packages
Schema: Fields
Relating to adding or deprecating fields in the JSON Schema
Milestone
Comments
jpmckinney
added
Focus - Packages
Relating to release packages and record packages
Schema
Relating to other changes in the JSON Schema (renamed fields, schema properties, etc.)
labels
Sep 8, 2019
jpmckinney
added
Schema: Fields
Relating to adding or deprecating fields in the JSON Schema
and removed
Schema
Relating to other changes in the JSON Schema (renamed fields, schema properties, etc.)
labels
Jul 17, 2020
Update: all these scrapers download record packages with the chile_compra_bulk |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
Focus - Packages
Relating to release packages and record packages
Schema: Fields
Relating to adding or deprecating fields in the JSON Schema
Background
Only Chile, Paraguay and Zambia use
packages
in record packages, using this query in Redash:Discussion
It's not clear what real (not imagined) use cases this field serves.
Proposal
Deprecate
packages
on record packages.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: