Draft of updates to relatedProcess #439
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
duncandewhurst
requested changes
Apr 19, 2017
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Shouldn't the enum for relatedProcess/scheme be replaced with a codelist csv and an opencodelist boolean?
To meet the use case for Red Compartida - scheme would need to be an open codelist, so for example compranet could be listed as the scheme with the compranet ID given.
Also recommend updating the description of relatedProcess/uri to read "machine or human readable"
|
@duncandewhurst Thanks for those points. I've made those changes and added some documentation pages also. |
duncandewhurst
approved these changes
Apr 24, 2017
2 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In this edit I've suggested refactoring relatedProcess so that it has schema and identifier, rather than OCID, and I've updated a number of other definitions.
We would then layer onto this an extension to add 'description' and 'estimatedValue' fields required by EU and some PPP use-cases.