-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 64
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: various edge cases in targeting #1041
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
✅ Deploy Preview for polite-licorice-3db33c canceled.
|
docs/reference/specifications/custom-operations/fractional-operation-spec.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/reference/specifications/custom-operations/fractional-operation-spec.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/reference/specifications/custom-operations/semver-operation-spec.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
docs/reference/specifications/custom-operations/string-comparison-operation-spec.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
Approved, to me it makes sense to be more specific here, and I agree that for boolean results returning |
1abec3d
to
d355b77
Compare
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1041 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 72.17% 71.87% -0.30%
==========================================
Files 28 28
Lines 2864 2866 +2
==========================================
- Hits 2067 2060 -7
- Misses 695 701 +6
- Partials 102 105 +3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
@bacherfl please re-review when you can. |
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
docs/reference/specifications/custom-operations/semver-operation-spec.md
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for the update @toddbaert - conceptually that makes perfect sense. just had some minor suggestions regarding the code, but when those are fixed this PR should be good to go :)
Co-authored-by: Michael Beemer <beeme1mr@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Todd Baert <todd.baert@dynatrace.com>
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop* --- <details><summary>flagd: 0.7.2</summary> ## [0.7.2](flagd/v0.7.1...flagd/v0.7.2) (2023-12-05) ### 🐛 Bug Fixes * **deps:** update module github.com/open-feature/flagd/core to v0.7.1 ([#1037](#1037)) ([0ed9b68](0ed9b68)) </details> <details><summary>flagd-proxy: 0.3.2</summary> ## [0.3.2](flagd-proxy/v0.3.1...flagd-proxy/v0.3.2) (2023-12-05) ### 🐛 Bug Fixes * **deps:** update module github.com/open-feature/flagd/core to v0.7.1 ([#1037](#1037)) ([0ed9b68](0ed9b68)) </details> <details><summary>core: 0.7.2</summary> ## [0.7.2](core/v0.7.1...core/v0.7.2) (2023-12-05) ### 🐛 Bug Fixes * **deps:** update module github.com/open-feature/open-feature-operator to v0.5.0 ([#1039](#1039)) ([eb128d9](eb128d9)) * **deps:** update module github.com/open-feature/open-feature-operator to v0.5.1 ([#1046](#1046)) ([0321935](0321935)) * **deps:** update module golang.org/x/crypto to v0.16.0 ([#1033](#1033)) ([b79aaf2](b79aaf2)) * **deps:** update module golang.org/x/net to v0.19.0 ([#1034](#1034)) ([c6426b2](c6426b2)) * various edge cases in targeting ([#1041](#1041)) ([ca38c16](ca38c16)) </details> --- This PR was generated with [Release Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See [documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please). Co-authored-by: github-actions[bot] <41898282+github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
While discussing this, @beeme1mr and I realized it was worth adding a bit more precision here. Please let me know what you folks think, particularly @Kavindu-Dodan and @bacherfl who helped implement some of these.
The main reason this is important, is I will be creating some "negative" gherkin tests to make sure bad inputs and mis-configurations behave consistently across all flagd engine implementations.
Update: new gherkin is here.