New feature - option to use libtcmu without netlink #694
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
This PR addresses some of the goals outlined in #519, |
|
Could you add the detail comments and signed-off-by in the commit ? |
lxbsz
reviewed
Jan 30, 2023
tcmu-synthesizer.c
Outdated
| @@ -197,7 +198,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) | |||
| exit(1); | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| ctx = tcmulib_initialize(&syn_handler, 1); | |||
| ctx = tcmulib_initialize(&syn_handler, 1, use_netlink); | |||
lxbsz
reviewed
Jan 30, 2023
|
|
||
| static bool create_backstore() | ||
| { | ||
| int ret = system("./create_backstore.sh"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This seems incorrect approach.
Why not comply to the current consumer.c, which will create the devices via targetcli or ceph-iscsi ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For one, I don't believe targetcli has the ability to specify nl_reply_supported=-1 when creating the backstore. This is vital if you want to use TCMU without netlink. Secondly, I think there's merit in having a completely stand-alone example which doesn't require the user to have external tools installed.
geordieintheshellcode
pushed a commit
to ondat/tcmu-runner
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2023
Some folks might be using libtcmu in their own applications which don't hook into TCMU runner, much like the consumer.c example. In those cases, it can be useful to avoid using netlink altogether. As I'm sure you are aware, it's almost impossible to have more than one user of TCMU when netlink is involved. This is because the kernel broadcasts device events to all TCMU listeners over netlink and simply accepts the first response it receives. This can lead to the following scenario: 1. Application A creates a TCMU backstore with handler=app_a 2. The kernel (target_core_user) broadcasts the netlink message to all instances of libtcmu 3. Application B receives the message first. Application B doesn't have a handler for app_a, so it replies with an error code to the kernel. 4. The kernel receives the error and aborts backstore creation. 5. Application A wonders why its backstore creation failed. Users can avoid using netlink altogether by setting nl_reply_supported=-1 at backing store creation time. This is great as multiple applications using TCMU can now coexist on the same machine. The problem is we don't have a nice way to utilise libtcmu in this model. We need a way to notify libtcmu that a device has been created, reconfigured, removed so the relevant handlers can be called. Currently, this is done via netlink. This PR allows users to utilise all the great features of libtcmu, but without using netlink. The PR makes the following changes: * modify tcmulib_initialize to take a boolean parameter which informs libtcmu whether or not it should set up netlink. If true we do. If false we don't. * expose new methods tcmulib_notify_device_added, tcmulib_notify_device_removed and tcmulib_notify_device_reconfiged, which application code should call to inform libtcmu that a device has been added, removed, or reconfigured. These API's take the dev_name and pass through to the existing device_add, device_remove and device_reconfig functions in libtcmu.c. tcmulib_notify_device_reconfiged will need additional parameters to specify the new config. * updates the documentation to reflect these changes and notes that tcmulib_master_fd_ready and tcmulib_get_master_fd should not be called if you chose to call tcmulib_initialize in "don't use netlink mode". * adds an example application consumer_no_netlink which shows how to create a standalone application using libtcmu without netlink. Issue open-iscsi#678. PR open-iscsi#694 Signed-off-by: Xiubo Li <xiubli@redhat.com>
geordieintheshellcode
force-pushed
the
no-netlink
branch
from
8ab145a to
e53de87
Compare
Done. |
Some folks might be using libtcmu in their own applications which don't hook into TCMU runner, much like the consumer.c example. In those cases, it can be useful to avoid using netlink altogether. As I'm sure you are aware, it's almost impossible to have more than one user of TCMU when netlink is involved. This is because the kernel broadcasts device events to all TCMU listeners over netlink and simply accepts the first response it receives. This can lead to the following scenario: 1. Application A creates a TCMU backstore with handler=app_a 2. The kernel (target_core_user) broadcasts the netlink message to all instances of libtcmu 3. Application B receives the message first. Application B doesn't have a handler for app_a, so it replies with an error code to the kernel. 4. The kernel receives the error and aborts backstore creation. 5. Application A wonders why its backstore creation failed. Users can avoid using netlink altogether by setting nl_reply_supported=-1 at backing store creation time. This is great as multiple applications using TCMU can now coexist on the same machine. The problem is we don't have a nice way to utilise libtcmu in this model. We need a way to notify libtcmu that a device has been created, reconfigured, removed so the relevant handlers can be called. Currently, this is done via netlink. This PR allows users to utilise all the great features of libtcmu, but without using netlink. The PR makes the following changes: * modify tcmulib_initialize to take a boolean parameter which informs libtcmu whether or not it should set up netlink. If true we do. If false we don't. * expose new methods tcmulib_notify_device_added, tcmulib_notify_device_removed and tcmulib_notify_device_reconfiged, which application code should call to inform libtcmu that a device has been added, removed, or reconfigured. These API's take the dev_name and pass through to the existing device_add, device_remove and device_reconfig functions in libtcmu.c. tcmulib_notify_device_reconfiged will need additional parameters to specify the new config. * updates the documentation to reflect these changes and notes that tcmulib_master_fd_ready and tcmulib_get_master_fd should not be called if you chose to call tcmulib_initialize in "don't use netlink mode". * adds an example application consumer_no_netlink which shows how to create a standalone application using libtcmu without netlink. Issue open-iscsi#678. PR open-iscsi#694 Signed-off-by: Alex Reid <alex.reid@storageos.com>
geordieintheshellcode
force-pushed
the
no-netlink
branch
from
e53de87 to
4099806
Compare
|
Fixed commit comments |
|
+1 For my use-case i need for multiple libtcmu instances in different containers to coexist. @geordieintheshellcode thank you for your contribution. I will port your PR to my fork for now https://github.com/hocus-dev/photon-libtcmu/tree/hocus |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some folks might be using libtcmu in their own applications which don't hook into TCMU runner, much like the
consumer.cexample. In those cases, it can be useful to avoid using netlink altogether. As I'm sure you are aware, it's almost impossible to have more than one user of TCMU when netlink is involved. This is because the kernel broadcasts device events to all TCMU listeners over netlink and simply accepts the first response it receives. This can lead to the following scenario:Users can avoid using netlink altogether by setting
nl_reply_supported=-1at backing store creation time. This is great as multiple applications using TCMU can now coexist on the same machine. The problem is we don't have a nice way to utilise libtcmu in this model. We need a way to notify libtcmu that a device has been created, reconfigured, removed so the relevant handlers can be called. Currently, this is done via netlink.This PR allows users to utilise all the great features of libtcmu, but without using netlink. The PR makes the following changes:
tcmulib_initializeto take a boolean parameter which informs libtcmu whether or not it should set up netlink. Iftruewe do. Iffalsewe don't.tcmulib_notify_device_added,tcmulib_notify_device_removedandtcmulib_notify_device_reconfiged, which application code should call to inform libtcmu that a device has been added, removed, or reconfigured. These API's take thedev_nameand pass through to the existingdevice_add,device_removeanddevice_reconfigfunctions in libtcmu.c.tcmulib_notify_device_reconfigedwill need additional parameters to specify the new config.tcmulib_master_fd_readyandtcmulib_get_master_fdshould not be called if you chose to calltcmulib_initializein "don't use netlink mode".consumer_no_netlinkwhich shows how to create a standalone application using libtcmu without netlink.Initial discussion of this feature: #678