Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor: fixed KPI was showing success even the target was not met #14220

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 4, 2023

Conversation

ShaileshParmar11
Copy link
Contributor

@ShaileshParmar11 ShaileshParmar11 commented Dec 4, 2023

Describe your changes:

fixed KPI was showing success even the target was not met

image

Type of change:

  • Bug fix
  • Improvement
  • New feature
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • My PR title is Fixes <issue-number>: <short explanation>
  • I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • For JSON Schema changes: I updated the migration scripts or explained why it is not needed.

@github-actions github-actions bot added UI UI specific issues safe to test Add this label to run secure Github workflows on PRs labels Dec 4, 2023
@ShaileshParmar11 ShaileshParmar11 changed the title Minor: fixed KPI was showing success even the target did not met Minor: fixed KPI was showing success even the target was not met Dec 4, 2023
@ShaileshParmar11 ShaileshParmar11 self-assigned this Dec 4, 2023
className="w-full p-t-lg p-r-xs"
data-testid="kpi-latest-result-container"
direction="vertical"
size={48}>
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this size intentional?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, it's intentional, to have a gap between 2 KPI
image

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2023

Jest test Coverage

UI tests summary

Lines Statements Branches Functions
Coverage: 48%
49.08% (24084/49074) 30.65% (9050/29523) 30.55% (2739/8967)

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Dec 4, 2023

[open-metadata-ui] Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@ShaileshParmar11 ShaileshParmar11 merged commit 28c0b22 into main Dec 4, 2023
17 checks passed
@ShaileshParmar11 ShaileshParmar11 deleted the kpi-days-left-change branch December 4, 2023 14:51
MrVinegar pushed a commit to MrVinegar/OpenMetadata that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
safe to test Add this label to run secure Github workflows on PRs UI UI specific issues
Projects
No open projects
Status: Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants