fix: rendering of more complex pipelines tree view

[mgorsk1]

Describe your changes:

Fixes 14599

I worked on fixing executionUtils getTreeData method because it's current implementation is not suitable for precise depicting parent > child relationships between pipeline tasks in Tree view of Executions tab.

Before (notice lack of process_task_X in Tree view of Executions tab)

Nagranie.z.ekranu.2024-01-5.o.17.47.23.mov

After:

Nagranie.z.ekranu.2024-01-5.o.18.01.13.mov

Type of change:

• Bug fix
• Improvement
• New feature
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Documentation

Checklist:

• I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
• My PR title is Fixes <issue-number>: <short explanation>
• I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
• For JSON Schema changes: I updated the migration scripts or explained why it is not needed.

[github-actions]

Hi there 👋 Thanks for your contribution!

The OpenMetadata team will review the PR shortly! Once it has been labeled as safe to test, the CI workflows
will start executing and we'll be able to make sure everything is working as expected.

Let us know if you need any help!

[github-actions]

Hi there 👋 Thanks for your contribution!

The OpenMetadata team will review the PR shortly! Once it has been labeled as safe to test, the CI workflows
will start executing and we'll be able to make sure everything is working as expected.

Let us know if you need any help!

[github-actions]

Hi there 👋 Thanks for your contribution!

The OpenMetadata team will review the PR shortly! Once it has been labeled as safe to test, the CI workflows
will start executing and we'll be able to make sure everything is working as expected.

Let us know if you need any help!

[harshach]

hi @mgorsk1 Thanks for the PR. We will review and merge it in
cc @chirag-madlani

[harshach]

@ShaileshParmar11 did your DAG changes for this merged in? can you work with @mgorsk1 to get this PR in.

[github-actions]

Jest test Coverage

UI tests summary

Lines	Statements	Branches	Functions
	51.52% (25835/50144)	33.75% (10165/30120)	32.5% (2969/9134)

[ShaileshParmar11]

Yes my UI changes merged! @harshach

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed for 'open-metadata-ui'

Kudos, no new issues were introduced!

0 New issues
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[mgorsk1]

so are we happy about this PR @ShaileshParmar11? I have fixed all the linting issues and ci seems to be satisfied.

[chirag-madlani]

Thank you @mgorsk1

[mgorsk1]

🤝🏼