Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MINOR: shown NoDataPlaceholder if no search result found in glossary #18718

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

Ashish8689
Copy link
Contributor

Describe your changes:

Fixes

  • I worked on showing NoDataPlaceholder if no search result found in glossary

Issue :

Screen.Recording.2024-11-14.at.06.19.46.mov

Resolved :

Screen.Recording.2024-11-21.at.2.37.36.PM.mov

Type of change:

  • Bug fix
  • Improvement
  • New feature
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • Documentation

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • My PR title is Fixes <issue-number>: <short explanation>
  • I have commented on my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • For JSON Schema changes: I updated the migration scripts or explained why it is not needed.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Jest test Coverage

UI tests summary

Lines Statements Branches Functions
Coverage: 63%
63.58% (39841/62659) 40.16% (15817/39385) 42.33% (4725/11161)

Copy link

@Ashish8689 Ashish8689 merged commit 253fc6b into main Nov 21, 2024
14 of 16 checks passed
@Ashish8689 Ashish8689 deleted the tree-select-list-no-data branch November 21, 2024 17:12
harshach pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 24, 2024
…18718)

* shown NoDataPlaceholder if no search result found in glossary

* minor label change

* added loader, while search response pending
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
safe to test Add this label to run secure Github workflows on PRs UI UI specific issues
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants