Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Benchmark] Add BiSeNetV1 COCO-Stuff 164k benchmark #1019

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 17, 2021

Conversation

MengzhangLI
Copy link
Contributor

Uploading BiSeNetV1 model (R18, R50, R101) on Coco-Stuff 164k dataset.

Paper: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1808.00897.pdf
R18: 28.1(paper), 28.55(ours)
R101: 31.3(paper), 37.38(ours)

image

@MengzhangLI MengzhangLI self-assigned this Nov 8, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 8, 2021

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.55%. Comparing base (6b3e550) to head (98abfec).
Report is 300 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1019   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.55%   89.55%           
=======================================
  Files         119      119           
  Lines        6626     6626           
  Branches     1034     1034           
=======================================
  Hits         5934     5934           
  Misses        488      488           
  Partials      204      204           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 89.55% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@RockeyCoss
Copy link
Contributor

Please merge the master branch into your branch, thank you.

@Junjun2016 Junjun2016 changed the title [Benchmark] Uploading BiSeNetV1 on Coco-Stuff 164k [Benchmark] Add BiSeNetV1 COCO-Stuff 164k benchmark Nov 17, 2021
@Junjun2016 Junjun2016 requested a review from xvjiarui November 17, 2021 06:56
@xvjiarui xvjiarui merged commit e38eae3 into open-mmlab:master Nov 17, 2021
@MengzhangLI MengzhangLI deleted the bisenetv1_cocostuff164k branch February 1, 2022 03:17
bowenroom pushed a commit to bowenroom/mmsegmentation that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2022
* bisenetv1 on cocostuff164k

* change config_names & delete redundant keys

* pretrain should before lr.

* remove redundancy in bisenetv1_r50-d32
aravind-h-v pushed a commit to aravind-h-v/mmsegmentation that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
* k-diffusion-euler

* make style make quality

* make fix-copies

* fix tests for euler a

* Update src/diffusers/schedulers/scheduling_euler_ancestral_discrete.py

Co-authored-by: Anton Lozhkov <aglozhkov@gmail.com>

* Update src/diffusers/schedulers/scheduling_euler_ancestral_discrete.py

Co-authored-by: Anton Lozhkov <aglozhkov@gmail.com>

* Update src/diffusers/schedulers/scheduling_euler_discrete.py

Co-authored-by: Anton Lozhkov <aglozhkov@gmail.com>

* Update src/diffusers/schedulers/scheduling_euler_discrete.py

Co-authored-by: Anton Lozhkov <aglozhkov@gmail.com>

* remove unused arg and method

* update doc

* quality

* make flake happy

* use logger instead of warn

* raise error instead of deprication

* don't require scipy

* pass generator in step

* fix tests

* Apply suggestions from code review

Co-authored-by: Pedro Cuenca <pedro@huggingface.co>

* Update tests/test_scheduler.py

Co-authored-by: Patrick von Platen <patrick.v.platen@gmail.com>

* remove unused generator

* pass generator as extra_step_kwargs

* update tests

* pass generator as kwarg

* pass generator as kwarg

* quality

* fix test for lms

* fix tests

Co-authored-by: patil-suraj <surajp815@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Anton Lozhkov <aglozhkov@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Pedro Cuenca <pedro@huggingface.co>
Co-authored-by: Patrick von Platen <patrick.v.platen@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants