Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip CI on ignoring given paths #1078

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 29, 2021
Merged

Conversation

del-zhenwu
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: del-zhenwu dele.zhenwu@gmail.com

Motivation

Skip CI workflows for the updates which match the rules

Modification

Please briefly describe what modification is made in this PR.

BC-breaking (Optional)

Does the modification introduce changes that break the backward-compatibility of the downstream repos?
If so, please describe how it breaks the compatibility and how the downstream projects should modify their code to keep compatibility with this PR.

Use cases (Optional)

If this PR introduces a new feature, it is better to list some use cases here, and update the documentation.

Checklist

  1. Pre-commit or other linting tools are used to fix the potential lint issues.
  2. The modification is covered by complete unit tests. If not, please add more unit test to ensure the correctness.
  3. If the modification has potential influence on downstream projects, this PR should be tested with downstream projects, like MMDet or MMDet3D.
  4. The documentation has been modified accordingly, like docstring or example tutorials.

Signed-off-by: del-zhenwu <dele.zhenwu@gmail.com>
@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Nov 26, 2021

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@Junjun2016
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @del-zhenwu
Thanks for your contribution.

@Junjun2016 Junjun2016 requested a review from xvjiarui November 26, 2021 03:31
Signed-off-by: del-zhenwu <dele.zhenwu@gmail.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 29, 2021

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.50%. Comparing base (0e6eeb8) to head (8a19f59).
Report is 294 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1078      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.64%   89.50%   -0.15%     
==========================================
  Files         120      120              
  Lines        6657     6670      +13     
  Branches     1037     1113      +76     
==========================================
+ Hits         5968     5970       +2     
- Misses        485      496      +11     
  Partials      204      204              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 89.50% <ø> (-0.15%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Junjun2016 Junjun2016 merged commit 5f8b935 into open-mmlab:master Nov 29, 2021
bowenroom pushed a commit to bowenroom/mmsegmentation that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2022
* Skip CI on ignoring given paths

Signed-off-by: del-zhenwu <dele.zhenwu@gmail.com>

* Fix ignoring path with using

Signed-off-by: del-zhenwu <dele.zhenwu@gmail.com>
aravind-h-v pushed a commit to aravind-h-v/mmsegmentation that referenced this pull request Mar 27, 2023
…b#1078)

Allow None safety_checker when using CPU offload.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants