Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Docs] Fix the wrong description in the Chinese documentation #954

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2021
Merged

[Docs] Fix the wrong description in the Chinese documentation #954

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 12, 2021

Conversation

RockeyCoss
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your contribution and we appreciate it a lot. The following instructions would make your pull request more healthy and more easily get feedback. If you do not understand some items, don't worry, just make the pull request and seek help from maintainers.

Motivation

fix the wrong description in the Chinese documentation

Modification

changed 8x + 1 to 8x

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Oct 12, 2021

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@Junjun2016 Junjun2016 changed the title fix the wrong description in the Chinese documentation [Docs] Fix the wrong description in the Chinese documentation Oct 12, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 12, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #954 (4d1cf9a) into master (796d5ed) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #954   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.90%   89.90%           
=======================================
  Files         117      117           
  Lines        6555     6555           
  Branches     1019     1019           
=======================================
  Hits         5893     5893           
  Misses        461      461           
  Partials      201      201           
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 89.90% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 796d5ed...4d1cf9a. Read the comment docs.

@Junjun2016
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @RockeyCoss
Please sign the CLA.

@Junjun2016 Junjun2016 merged commit c403177 into open-mmlab:master Oct 12, 2021
bowenroom pushed a commit to bowenroom/mmsegmentation that referenced this pull request Feb 25, 2022
@jason102811
Copy link

rockeycoss,您好!您在MMSeg项目中给我们提的PR非常重要,感谢您付出私人时间帮助改进开源项目,相信很多开发者会从你的PR中受益。
我们非常期待与您继续合作,OpenMMLab专门成立了贡献者组织MMSIG,为贡献者们提供开源证书、荣誉体系和专享好礼,可通过添加微信:openmmlabwx 联系我们(请备注mmsig+GitHub id),由衷希望您能加入!
Dear rockeycoss,
First of all, we want to express our gratitude for your significant PR in the MMSeg project. Your contribution is highly appreciated, and we are grateful for your efforts in helping improve this open-source project during your personal time. We believe that many developers will benefit from your PR.
We are looking forward to continuing our collaboration with you. OpenMMLab has established a special contributors' organization called MMSIG, which provides contributors with open-source certificates, a recognition system, and exclusive rewards. You can contact us by adding our WeChat(if you have WeChat): openmmlabwx, or join in our discord: https://discord.gg/qH9fysxPDW. We sincerely hope you will join us!
Best regards! @RockeyCoss

wjkim81 pushed a commit to wjkim81/mmsegmentation that referenced this pull request Dec 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants