misleading error message when supplying wrong argument type to - operator

[srenatus]

Expected/Actual Behavior

When evaluating

{ 1, 2, 3 } - 3

you get this error message:

{ 1, 2, 3 } - 3: eval_type_error: minus: operand 2 must be one of {number, set} but got number

and vice versa for 3 - { 1, 2, 3 }.

I'm not saying that it shouldn't error -- it should, this is wrong usage of the - operator -- it's just that the error reads funny. 😃

Additional Info

👉 playground

[tsandall]

Fixing this in one place would be relatively easy.

I'm wondering if we'd be better off replacing the built-in function operand errors with the ast package-style type errors. E.g., in this case...

eval_type_error: invalid argument(s)
   have: (set[number], number)
   want (one of): (set[any], set[any])
                  (number, number)

[stale]

This issue has been automatically marked as inactive because it has not had any activity in the last 30 days.