[processor/resourcedetection] introduce retry mechanism for detectors #37506
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
the
processor/resourcedetection
odubajDT
force-pushed
the
docker-resource-failure
branch
2 times, most recently
from
8e0c7a7 to
5094273
Compare
|
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 14 days. |
|
not stale |
mx-psi
reviewed
Feb 12, 2025
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <ondrej.dubaj@dynatrace.com>
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <ondrej.dubaj@dynatrace.com>
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <ondrej.dubaj@dynatrace.com>
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <ondrej.dubaj@dynatrace.com>
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <ondrej.dubaj@dynatrace.com>
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <ondrej.dubaj@dynatrace.com>
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <ondrej.dubaj@dynatrace.com>
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <ondrej.dubaj@dynatrace.com>
odubajDT
force-pushed
the
docker-resource-failure
branch
from
9376bd9 to
b5a70ae
Compare
dashpole
reviewed
Feb 20, 2025
processor/resourcedetectionprocessor/internal/resourcedetection.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <ondrej.dubaj@dynatrace.com>
odubajDT
commented
Feb 21, 2025
processor/resourcedetectionprocessor/internal/resourcedetection.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
dashpole
reviewed
Feb 21, 2025
processor/resourcedetectionprocessor/internal/resourcedetection.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <ondrej.dubaj@dynatrace.com>
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <ondrej.dubaj@dynatrace.com>
dashpole
approved these changes
Feb 24, 2025
mx-psi
reviewed
Feb 24, 2025
processor/resourcedetectionprocessor/internal/resourcedetection.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
processor/resourcedetectionprocessor/internal/resourcedetection.go
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <ondrej.dubaj@dynatrace.com>
|
LGTM modulo fixing CI :) |
Signed-off-by: odubajDT <ondrej.dubaj@dynatrace.com>
github-actions
bot
requested review from
ankitpatel96,
dineshg13,
IbraheemA,
jade-guiton-dd,
liustanley and
mackjmr
Should be ok now |
mx-psi
approved these changes
Feb 25, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Introduce retry mechanism for detectors.
Link to tracking issue
Fixes #34761