Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove flaky BatchSpanProcessor.ForceFlush() test #1189

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 21, 2020

Conversation

Aneurysm9
Copy link
Member

It is unreliable with no clear good way to make it reliable. The
ForceFlush() method is a simple passthrough to bsp.exportSpans() and the
existing tests of that method should suffice.

It is unreliable with no clear good way to make it reliable.  The
ForceFlush() method is a simple passthrough to bsp.exportSpans() and the
existing tests of that method should suffice.
@Aneurysm9 Aneurysm9 added the Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry label Sep 20, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@evantorrie evantorrie left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Refer to #1166 and #1178 for more context.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 21, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1189 into master will increase coverage by 0.1%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #1189     +/-   ##
========================================
+ Coverage    76.9%   77.0%   +0.1%     
========================================
  Files         135     135             
  Lines        5867    5867             
========================================
+ Hits         4517    4523      +6     
+ Misses       1109    1103      -6     
  Partials      241     241             
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
sdk/trace/batch_span_processor.go 80.6% <0.0%> (+6.4%) ⬆️

@MrAlias MrAlias merged commit b9357d7 into open-telemetry:master Sep 21, 2020
@pellared pellared added this to the untracked milestone Nov 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Skip Changelog PRs that do not require a CHANGELOG.md entry
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants