-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Load OTel SDK config from environment variables and system properties.… #1434
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Load OTel SDK config from environment variables and system properties.… #1434
Conversation
AutoConfiguredOpenTelemetrySdk autoConfiguredOpenTelemetrySdk = | ||
AutoConfiguredOpenTelemetrySdk.builder() | ||
.setServiceClassLoader(getClass().getClassLoader()) | ||
.addPropertiesSupplier(() -> properties) | ||
.addPropertiesCustomizer(configProperties -> { | ||
// Change default of "otel.[traces,metrics,logs].exporter" from "otlp" to "none" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[minor] Could you elaborate a bit in a comment on why we need to override the default here ? For example, if I understand correctly when there is no endpoint configured then we assume the extension should silently skip exporting signals.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the review Sylvain, please see updated comment
@cyrille-leclerc just a heads up looks like there's a failing test |
Thanks @trask , unit test fixed. |
cc @kenfinnigan in case you have a chance to review |
@SylvainJuge could you by any chance review this PR? |
maven-extension/src/main/java/io/opentelemetry/maven/OpenTelemetrySdkService.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
maven-extension/src/main/java/io/opentelemetry/maven/OpenTelemetrySdkService.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
maven-extension/src/test/java/io/opentelemetry/maven/OpenTelemetrySdkServiceTest.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Thanks @SylvainJuge , I'll improve ASAP |
maven-extension/src/main/java/io/opentelemetry/maven/OpenTelemetrySdkService.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
maven-extension/src/main/java/io/opentelemetry/maven/OpenTelemetrySdkService.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
return properties; | ||
} | ||
|
||
enum SignalType { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[minor] could be made private, also this might be further simplified to an Arrays.asList("traces","metrics","logs")
.
ConfigProperties configProperties) { | ||
|
||
Map<String, String> properties = new HashMap<>(); | ||
if (configProperties.getString("otel.exporter.otlp.endpoint") == null) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[minor style] given most of the code is within this if statement, then inverting the condition and doing an early return with the debug statement avoids a bit of nesting by doing the "quick path" first.
.disableShutdownHook() | ||
.build(); | ||
|
||
this.openTelemetrySdk = autoConfiguredOpenTelemetrySdk.getOpenTelemetrySdk(); | ||
|
||
logger.debug("OpenTelemetry: OpenTelemetrySdkService initialized, resource:{}", resource); | ||
|
||
// TODO should we replace `getBooleanConfig(name)` by `configProperties.getBoolean(name)`? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
[minor] can we answer this TODO directly into this PR or are there still unknowns there to be answered before being able to do this change ?
System.setProperty("otel.service.name", "my-maven"); | ||
try { | ||
testConfiguration("my-maven"); | ||
System.setProperty("otel.resource.attributes", "key1=val1,key2=val2"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think it would be a bit better to not rely on global state (here in system properties) as we have to take care of the cleanup here.
What I think could be slightly better is to add an argument to the OpenTelemetrySdkService
constructor to control which system properties are present or not if we can. While this slightly alters the design for test purpose it could be worth it here as it allows to get rid of any early cleanup or finally block. Also with such a change there can't be any side effect if system properties are set on the JVM that execute the tests which usually require us to ensure properties are not set in some cases.
The AutoConfiguredOpenTelemetrySdkBuilder.setConfigPropertiesCustomizer
allows to override the config properties, but it's package-private so using AutoConfigureUtil.setConfigPropertiesCustomizer
is needed. While it's an internal API doing this only for tests should be fine.
Description:
Load OTel SDK config from environment variables and system properties.
Existing Issue(s):
Testing:
See added unit tests
Documentation:
< Describe the documentation added.
Please be sure to modify relevant existing documentation if needed. >
Outstanding items:
< Anything that these changes are intentionally missing
that will be needed or can be helpful in the future. >