split system.network.connections into TCP and UDP metrics #2675
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
As a follow up to open-telemetry#2663, since UDP has no state attribute, I propose UDP and TCP connection metrics should be split into protocol specific metric for each supported protocol.
jmacd
approved these changes
Jul 18, 2022
tigrannajaryan
dismissed
their stale review
Unblocking, now that #2653 is merged
|
Please add this change to the schema file 1.13. |
|
This PR was marked stale due to lack of activity. It will be closed in 7 days. |
Oberon00
reviewed
Jul 29, 2022
|
This PR is not stale, I'm waiting on #2688 to merge before adding the schema to this PR |
|
@tigrannajaryan schema file added 👍🏻 |
tigrannajaryan
approved these changes
Aug 2, 2022
arminru
approved these changes
Aug 5, 2022
tigrannajaryan
added a commit
to tigrannajaryan/opentelemetry-specification
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2022
tigrannajaryan
added a commit
to tigrannajaryan/opentelemetry-specification
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 29, 2022
tigrannajaryan
added a commit
to tigrannajaryan/opentelemetry-specification
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2022
tigrannajaryan
added a commit
to tigrannajaryan/opentelemetry-specification
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 30, 2022
tigrannajaryan
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2022
…ection`" (#2748) Please review this carefully. It is not an automatic reverting, I had to fix merge conflicts manually and may have made mistakes, so a thorough review is needed. Changes: - This reverts #2617. We are reverting it until we are certain how to resolve issue #2726 - Also reverts the corresponding schema file changes done in #2688 - Also reverts #2675 ~Note that this does not revert #2675 which I believe to still be valid. If you think otherwise please speak.~ [UPDATE: discussed in Spec SIG and decided to revert 2675 too]. Contributes to #2726
MSNev
pushed a commit
to MSNev/opentelemetry-specification
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 6, 2022
… "add metrics to replace metrics with `direction`" (open-telemetry#2748) Please review this carefully. It is not an automatic reverting, I had to fix merge conflicts manually and may have made mistakes, so a thorough review is needed. Changes: - This reverts open-telemetry#2617. We are reverting it until we are certain how to resolve issue open-telemetry#2726 - Also reverts the corresponding schema file changes done in open-telemetry#2688 - Also reverts open-telemetry#2675 ~Note that this does not revert open-telemetry#2675 which I believe to still be valid. If you think otherwise please speak.~ [UPDATE: discussed in Spec SIG and decided to revert 2675 too]. Contributes to open-telemetry#2726
ChengJinbao
added a commit
to ChengJinbao/opentelemetry-specification
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 16, 2022
…ection`" (#2748) Please review this carefully. It is not an automatic reverting, I had to fix merge conflicts manually and may have made mistakes, so a thorough review is needed. Changes: - This reverts open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2617. We are reverting it until we are certain how to resolve issue #2726 - Also reverts the corresponding schema file changes done in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2688 - Also reverts open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2675 ~Note that this does not revert open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2675 which I believe to still be valid. If you think otherwise please speak.~ [UPDATE: discussed in Spec SIG and decided to revert 2675 too]. Contributes to open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2726
jsuereth
pushed a commit
to jsuereth/otel-semconv-test
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 19, 2023
…ection`" (#2748) Please review this carefully. It is not an automatic reverting, I had to fix merge conflicts manually and may have made mistakes, so a thorough review is needed. Changes: - This reverts open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2617. We are reverting it until we are certain how to resolve issue #2726 - Also reverts the corresponding schema file changes done in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2688 - Also reverts open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2675 ~Note that this does not revert open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2675 which I believe to still be valid. If you think otherwise please speak.~ [UPDATE: discussed in Spec SIG and decided to revert 2675 too]. Contributes to open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2726
jsuereth
pushed a commit
to open-telemetry/semantic-conventions
that referenced
this pull request
May 11, 2023
…ection`" (#2748) Please review this carefully. It is not an automatic reverting, I had to fix merge conflicts manually and may have made mistakes, so a thorough review is needed. Changes: - This reverts open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2617. We are reverting it until we are certain how to resolve issue #2726 - Also reverts the corresponding schema file changes done in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2688 - Also reverts open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2675 ~Note that this does not revert open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2675 which I believe to still be valid. If you think otherwise please speak.~ [UPDATE: discussed in Spec SIG and decided to revert 2675 too]. Contributes to open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2726
joaopgrassi
pushed a commit
to dynatrace-oss-contrib/semantic-conventions
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 21, 2024
…ection`" (#2748) Please review this carefully. It is not an automatic reverting, I had to fix merge conflicts manually and may have made mistakes, so a thorough review is needed. Changes: - This reverts open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2617. We are reverting it until we are certain how to resolve issue #2726 - Also reverts the corresponding schema file changes done in open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2688 - Also reverts open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2675 ~Note that this does not revert open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2675 which I believe to still be valid. If you think otherwise please speak.~ [UPDATE: discussed in Spec SIG and decided to revert 2675 too]. Contributes to open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification#2726
carlosalberto
pushed a commit
to carlosalberto/opentelemetry-specification
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 31, 2024
…etry#2675) Co-authored-by: Armin Ruech <armin.ruech@dynatrace.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As a follow up to #2663, since UDP has no state attribute, I propose UDP and TCP connection metrics should be split into protocol specific metric for each supported protocol.