Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 6, 2024. It is now read-only.

Simplify the rfc process #55

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Sep 28, 2019
Merged

Conversation

tedsuo
Copy link
Contributor

@tedsuo tedsuo commented Sep 26, 2019

This PR implements the proposal in #54

  • RFCs are now approved during the initial PR
  • README adjusted a for clarity
  • status line removed from RFC template
  • start date and PR link added to RFC template

Resolves #32
Resolves #54

* RFCs are now approved during the initial PR
* README shortened for clarity
* status line removed from RFC template
* start date and PR link added to RFC template
README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Member

@c24t c24t left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The changes to the text look great, and I think this is a big improvement over the existing process.

Now the question is whether you need an RFC to make changes to the RFC repo itself...

README.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
Co-Authored-By: Chris Kleinknecht <libc@google.com>
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
### Integrating the RFC into the Spec
* Once an RFC is `approved`, an issue is created in the [specification repo](https://github.com/open-telemetry/opentelemetry-specification) to integrate the RFC into the spec.
* When reviewing the spec PR for the RFC, focus on whether the spec is written clearly, and reflects the changes approved in the RFC. Please abstain from relitigating the approved RFC changes at this stage.
* An RFC is `integrated` when four reviewers github-approve the spec PR. The PR is then merged, and the spec is versioned.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we enforce one single spec PR for each RFC, or we allow (or even encourage) multiple smaller PRs?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmmmm, that's a good question. Hopefully RFCs are tightly scoped enough that it would not be an issue to make a single PR. If multiple PRs were needed, I think that would be fine... so long as we don't accidentally release a version of the spec with half an RFC!!

Copy link
Member

@reyang reyang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

0000-template.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@yurishkuro yurishkuro merged commit cb25877 into open-telemetry:master Sep 28, 2019
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Simply RFC process to better leverage GitHub Use pull/issue # as sequence numbers in the RFC file names
7 participants