Skip to content

Conversation

@Emily-TTG
Copy link
Contributor

oficial -> official

@jmalak jmalak merged commit c8b91df into open-watcom:master May 19, 2023
@jmalak
Copy link
Member

jmalak commented May 19, 2023

Thanks for your contribution.

@iainnicol
Copy link

Hi @Th3T3chn0G1t, I and a few others are trying to relicense Open Watcom. Currently Open Watcom is under an unusual license, and we want to move it to a more mainstream one. Please see the wiki for an explanation, or this absolutely massive discussion.

Would you be willing to relicense your contribution, under Apache 2.0, plus the LLVM Exceptions?

(To be honest, your fix, while valuable, is probably too small to be copyrightable. Nonetheless, it would still be useful, and clear, if you would be willing to relicense it.)

@jmalak
Copy link
Member

jmalak commented May 20, 2023

I think this file is not part of OW distribution, only GitHub readme file.

@iainnicol
Copy link

that's true, but it doesn't hurt for pedantic completeness. i'm just about to go through the v2-only contributors, and so i noticed this most recent commit.

@jmalak
Copy link
Member

jmalak commented May 20, 2023

It is not Original source, it is OW Contributors source only, that don't need re-licencing by SAP.

@iainnicol
Copy link

I disagree. I'll send you an email tomorrow to try to explain.

@Emily-TTG
Copy link
Contributor Author

@iainnicol sure lol - my single letter f perhaps unwarranted kwk

@Emily-TTG Emily-TTG deleted the patch-1 branch May 21, 2023 17:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants