-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Forcekit for simulations preserving topology #37
Comments
Hey! I used overlapping particles with extra exceptions too, it seemed to
work well for me. Probably, I also had to lower error tolerance and
increase the friction a bit - can look it up if that's useful!
Anton.
(typed on a phone, sorry for brevity and typos)
…On Tue, Dec 22, 2020, 18:53 Maksim Imakaev ***@***.***> wrote:
@golobor <https://github.com/golobor> @gfudenberg
<https://github.com/gfudenberg> - have you done topological simulations
recently? What parameters did you use?
I was thinking that it would be nice to have a forcekit that would be
guaranteed to preserve topology. There are a few options.
Recently, Kirill was using polynomialRepulsive (or Grosberg?) force with
10kT cutoff, but also with 0.6 distance between neighboring monomers in
harmonicRepulsive. It works, but I thought 0.6 is too short for the bond
length.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#37>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAG64CTYGLQWBXL55BDCT33SWDMJPANCNFSM4VF6ISMQ>
.
|
@henrik-dahl-pinholt was going to do some topology simulations recently. Maybe a result should be a "topology_preserving_chain" forcekit? |
Would be interesting. I am certainly playing around with it now. Currently, I am trying to implement it as a forcekit using the grosberg bond, angle, and non-bonded interaction. Another issue is multi-ring starting configurations which I am currently playing around with as well. Will update you on the progress when there are some results. |
@golobor @gfudenberg - have you done topological simulations recently? What parameters did you use?
I was thinking that it would be nice to have a forcekit that would be guaranteed to preserve topology. There are a few options.
Recently, Kirill was using polynomialRepulsive (or Grosberg?) force with 10kT cutoff, but also with 0.6 distance between neighboring monomers in harmonicRepulsive. It works, but I thought 0.6 is too short for the bond length.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: