Adding Sacramento to Legistar Scrapers #71
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Hi @feydan, can you resolve the merge conflicts in requirements.txt |
|
@fgregg done. |
|
Hi @feydan, I'm sorry, I was a little confused about what repo I was looking at. This repo is not the appropriate one for your scraper. You should add it to https://github.com/opencivicdata/scrapers-us-municipal |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I'm building off of work from a previous member at Code4Sac. I want to get some data in for Sacramento so that we can power a local Councilmatic application.
There was not much to go off of, but I was able to get some data locally with these changes.
Please let me know if there's anything else I can do for this PR.