Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SAI proposal for Synchronous Ethernet #2146

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rpmarvell
Copy link

@rpmarvell rpmarvell commented Mar 3, 2025

This proposal introduces Synchronous Ethernet(SyncE) to SAI with following details,

  • New SyncE clock object which can be used to program the SyncE clocks to recover the clock signal to the Switch device
  • New Hostif trap to handle the SSM over the ESMC protocol
  • New read-only switch attributes to get the SyncE clock capability of the Switch device

Comment on lines 5215 to 5220
if (SAI_OBJECT_TYPE_SYNCE == oi->objecttype)
{
META_LOG_WARN("synce object %s not present on any object list (eg. VLAN_MEMBER is present on SAI_VLAN_ATTR_MEMBER_LIST)", oi->objecttypename);
return;
}

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why this exception is made ? seems like your objects are not SET on any attributes that's why you are getting this error, why you dont set it on any other attributes ?

@kcudnik
Copy link
Collaborator

kcudnik commented Mar 3, 2025

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@rpmarvell rpmarvell force-pushed the rpmarvell_synce_sai_proposal branch 4 times, most recently from 32d985e to acf62c6 Compare March 12, 2025 05:04
Signed-off-by: rpmarvell <rperumal@marvell.com>
@rpmarvell rpmarvell force-pushed the rpmarvell_synce_sai_proposal branch from acf62c6 to f7ea70a Compare March 13, 2025 07:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants