-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
configs/validate: looser validation for RDT #3382
Conversation
Don't require CAT or MBA because we don't detect those correctly (we don't support L2 or L3DATA/L3CODE for example, and in the future possibly even more). With plain "ClosId mode" we don't really care: we assign the container to a pre-configured CLOS without trying to do anything smarter. Moreover, this was a duplicate/redundant check anyway, as for CAT and MBA there is another specific sanity check that is done if L3 or MB is specified in the config. Signed-off-by: Markus Lehtonen <markus.lehtonen@intel.com>
202a989
to
1d5c331
Compare
ping @kolyshkin |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @kolyshkin for the review.
Roger, will do 👍 |
ping @AkihiroSuda @thaJeztah, PTAL |
@marquiz please open a backport to |
Don't require CAT or MBA because we don't detect those correctly (we
don't support L2 or L3DATA/L3CODE for example, and in the future
possibly even more). With plain "ClosId mode" we don't really care: we
assign the container to a pre-configured CLOS without trying to do
anything smarter.
Moreover, this was a duplicate/redundant check anyway, as for CAT and
MBA there is another specific sanity check that is done if L3 or MB
is specified in the config.