You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We just tagged v0.1.1 yesterday, but I think the plan had been to make the opening tag v0.1.0 (which matches SemVer's first FAQ entry). In any event, #173 went with v0.1.0. It would be nice if the tag and the version.go constant matched each other ;), so I'd suggest bumping both to v0.1.2 to avoid any ambiguity.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Tag the thread about how we intend to version the spec. See
additional version discussion in [1,2,3,4,5].
[1]: Subject: Re: Initial Draft Release
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:58:08 -0700
Message-ID: <20150911205808.GC5912@odin.tremily.us>
[2]: opencontainers/runtime-spec#183
New v0.1.1 tag doesn't match v0.1.0 in version.go
[3]: opencontainers/runtime-spec#253
Clarify backwards compatibility for major version 0
[4]: opencontainers/runtime-spec#194
Correct version from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1
[5]: opencontainers/runtime-spec#278
Project: document release process
We just tagged v0.1.1 yesterday, but I think the plan had been to make the opening tag v0.1.0 (which matches SemVer's first FAQ entry). In any event, #173 went with v0.1.0. It would be nice if the tag and the
version.go
constant matched each other ;), so I'd suggest bumping both to v0.1.2 to avoid any ambiguity.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: