Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "Clarify backwards compatibility for major version 0" #488

Merged

Conversation

wking
Copy link
Contributor

@wking wking commented Jun 4, 2016

This reverts commit 0f25f18 (#253). Now that we're on to 1.0, we don't need to talk about 0.x. And the lack of 0.x backwards compatability is covered by SemVer 2.0 section 4:

Major version zero (0.y.z) is for initial development. Anything may change at any time. The public API should not be considered stable.

so removing the echo from our spec doesn't actually change anything.

This reverts commit 0f25f18, opencontainers#253.
Now that we're on to 1.0, we don't need to talk about 0.x.  And the
lack of 0.x backwards compatability is covered by SemVer 2.0 section 4
[1]:

  Major version zero (0.y.z) is for initial development.  Anything may
  change at any time.  The public API should not be considered stable.

so removing the echo from our spec doesn't actually change anything.

The conflict is due to 4e63ee0 (config: qualify the name of the
version field, 2016-01-13, opencontainers#309), and only impacted the context and
line-wrapping around the sentence I'm removing.

Conflicts:
	config.md

[1]: http://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html

Signed-off-by: W. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
@mrunalp
Copy link
Contributor

mrunalp commented Jun 6, 2016

LGTM

Approved with PullApprove

1 similar comment
@crosbymichael
Copy link
Member

crosbymichael commented Jun 6, 2016

LGTM

Approved with PullApprove

@crosbymichael crosbymichael merged commit e1be8d8 into opencontainers:master Jun 6, 2016
@wking wking deleted the drop-v0.x-compatibility-statement branch June 7, 2016 21:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants